Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.57 seconds)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. ... vs S. Ajith, M.S. Geetha, M.K. Soman And N. ... on 31 July, 2002

In the decision reported in Amati Hymavathi v. Nissankararao Srikrishnamurthy (AIR 1998 Andhra Pradesh 345) a Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court followed the above decision of this court and after elaborate consideration of various other decisions, laid down the following guidelines for the guidance of the Tribunal and the Courts in paragraph 37 of the judgment.

North West Karnataka Road Transport ... vs Rafiq Moulasab Bagawan And Anr. on 14 January, 2003

In the case of Amati Hymavathi and Anr. v. Nissankararao Srikrishna Murthy and Ors., 2000 ACJ 350 (AP) a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has considered number of decisions and observed that in the case of death of children on/after 14-11-1994, minimum compensation should be Rs. 50,000/-, but it may be more depending upon the facts and circumstances of each case.
Karnataka High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S B Majage - Full Document

Mohammed Akbar And Anr. vs Mustafa Khan And Ors. on 19 September, 2003

8. The learned Counsel for the appellants has also referred to one more judgment pertaining to the group of appellants in the matter of Amti Hymavarthi Anr. v. Nissankararao Srikrishna Murthy and Ors. . In this reported judgment, the learned Counsel pointed out that the facts are similar. According to the learned Counsel, these petitions were governed by the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and his case is also governed by the said Act. In this reported case, an amount of Rs. 35,000/- is granted by way of compensation for the death of a boy who was 4 years old on the date of death. Another case from the same judgment which is being referred to is regarding grant of compensation to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- for the death of a boy who was 6 years old and in appeal which was enhanced to the tune of Rs. 35,000/-.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S B Deshmukh - Full Document

Sh. Chakkanlal vs Sh.Anand Singh on 20 April, 2012

In Amati Hymavathi vs. Nissankararao Srikrishnamurthy, 1999 AJR 370 (AP) the Court emphasized that it is a duty of conductor and driver to see that either persons are prevented from boarding the bus or take care that the door is closed after all passengers have boarded in the bus. In the absence of such plea or defence or evidence, no plea of negligence or contributory negligence as against a child of tender age can be entertained or accepted.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1