Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Delhi Development Authority vs H.C. Khurana on 7 April, 1993

A.Jalender Reddy, S/O Sathi Reddy, Aged ... vs The State Of Telanana, Rep.By Its ... on 17 April, 2017

17. We may also point out, in this context, that in Delhi Development Authority v. H.C. Khurana [(1993) 3 SCC 196 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 736 : (1993) 24 ATC 763 : JT (1993) 2 SC 695] and Union of India v. Kewal Kumar [(1993) 3 SCC 204 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 744 : (1993) 24 ATC 770 : JT (1993) 2 SC 705] this Court found that the ratio in Jankiraman [(1991) 4 SCC 109 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 387 : (1993) 23 ATC 322] is applicable only to the situations similar to the cases discussed therein, and hence the Sealed Cover Procedure resorted to by DPC in those two cases was upheld by this Court. (emphasis supplied) 6.7.1.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - P N Rao - Full Document

P.C.G. Roy vs National Commission For Sc And St, A.P. ... on 3 August, 1999

25. It is also urged that the transfer has come into effect with the issue of communication and that it is not necessary that the order should be served upon the employee and hence the writ petition has become infructuous. Reliance is placed upon the judgment in Delhi Development Authority v. H.C. Khurana (SC), 1993 (2) SLR 509, and K. Seetharama Prasad v. Andhra Bank Limited (supra).
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - V B Rao - Full Document

S.Zabeda Parveen---- vs Counsel For The on 16 September, 2015

In Delhi Development Authority v. H.C. Khurana the Supreme Court explained in detail the procedure to be followed in disciplinary proceedings. It was held that framing the charge-sheet, is the first step taken for holding the enquiry into the allegations, on the decision taken to initiate disciplinary proceedings. The charge-sheet is framed on the basis of the allegations made against the government servant; the charge-sheet is then served on him to enable him to give his explanation; if the explanation is satisfactory, the proceedings are closed, otherwise, an enquiry is held into the charges-, if the charges are not proved, the proceedings are closed and the government servant exonerated; but if the charges are proved, the penalty follows. The Supreme Court has accordingly concluded that the service of the charge-sheet on the government servant follows the decision to initiate disciplinary proceeding.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - C V Reddy - Full Document

K. Seetharama Prasad vs Andhra Bank Ltd. And Anr. on 6 February, 1995

The requirement of despatch of charge memo was considered and laid down by the Supreme Court in Khurana (supra) in the context of initiation of a departmental enquiry, not in the context of launching of a criminal prosecution against an employee. It is needless to state that the moment the chargesheet was filed in the criminal law Court, the petitioner was entitled to be supplied/furnished a set of copies of the chargesheet and accompanying documents. It may be that the petitioner demanded the copies of the chargesheet and the accompanying documents later and the same were supplied to him on June 9, 1994. That fact alone cannot benefit the petitioner in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Kewal Kumar. Therefore the exception can be taken to the action of the respondent-Management in adopting the Sealed Cover Procedure in the case of the petitioner. The object of adopting the Sealed Cover Procedure is that an employee, particularly an employee in the public service, who is under a cloud of misconduct or an offence cannot be promoted to next higher cadre pending an enquiry into the alleged misconduct or commission of an offence, as the case may be. The public interest and requirement of credibility of the personnel occupying public offices support Sealed Cover Procedure and it is intended to inspire confidence in the mind of the public.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1