Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Santosh Kumar Yadav vs Union Of India Judgement Given By: ... on 12 December, 2013

Respondents have filed the reply and apart from contending that the claim was barred by time, respondents have indicated as to how and in what basis the merit criteria was considered and it is pointed out in Para-3.5 of the return that the claim of the petitioner was considered on three occasions in the year 2006, 2007 and 2008 and on all these W.P.No.18266/2011 Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs. The Union of India & Ors.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Basant Kumar Batham And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 October, 2025

In view of the analysis and for the reasons mentioned in the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by Division Bench in WRIT - C No. - 26529 of 2025 (Ramashankar Yadav And Another vs. Union Of India And 3 Others), we are not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioners to avail the statutory remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if they are so advised, within the limitation period prescribed thereunder.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1