Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.11 seconds)
Documents citing Kavita Kanwar vs Mrs. Pamela Mehta on 19 May, 2020

Sri S Krishna Rao vs M J Vittal on 6 March, 2023

124. To sum up, it is enough to refer to one of the recent decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 117 Kavita Kanwar vs. Mrs. Pamela Mehta and Others reported in (2021) 11 SCC 209, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court referred to almost all previous decisions right from H.Venkatachala Iyengar supra and held that in a given case a suspicion is created are essentially those where either the signature of the testator is disputed or the mental capacity of the testator is questioned. In the matter of appreciating the genuineness of the execution of a Will, there is no place for the Court to see whether the distribution made by the testator was fair and equitable to all of his children. It is further held that the Court is not required to apply Article 14 of the Constitution of India, to dispositions under a Will.
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Sri K Jagannath Rao vs M J Vittal on 6 March, 2023

124. To sum up, it is enough to refer to one of the recent decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of 117 Kavita Kanwar vs. Mrs. Pamela Mehta and Others reported in (2021) 11 SCC 209, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court referred to almost all previous decisions right from H.Venkatachala Iyengar supra and held that in a given case a suspicion is created are essentially those where either the signature of the testator is disputed or the mental capacity of the testator is questioned. In the matter of appreciating the genuineness of the execution of a Will, there is no place for the Court to see whether the distribution made by the testator was fair and equitable to all of his children. It is further held that the Court is not required to apply Article 14 of the Constitution of India, to dispositions under a Will.
Karnataka High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Umakanth @ Ramakanth vs Sharnappa Patil And Anr on 24 January, 2024

11. Sri Sachin M. Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondents argued that the finding recorded by the both the Courts below is just and proper and propounder of the Will has not proved the Will as required under law and accordingly, sought for dismissal of the appeal placing the reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in -8- NC: 2024:KHC-K:959 RSA No. 7382 of 2012 the case of Kavita Kanwar vs. Mrs.Pamela Mehta, reported in AIR 2020 SC 2614.
Karnataka High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next