Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing State vs Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors. on 17 September, 2014

State (Gnct Of Delhi) vs Mukim Ali @ Jumman Ali & Ors. on 18 May, 2020

11. Next, she submitted that the appeal was unmerited as the impugned order did not suffer from any manifest error. She stated that an appellate court would interfere with the sentence only where it shocks the court's conscience and in exceptional cases, where it finds the order on sentence manifestly erroneous. She submitted that there was no minimum sentence prescribed for committing an offence punishable under Section 308/34 of the IPC (the offence for which the respondents were convicted) and therefore, the sentence awarded to them was well within the scope of the Trial Court's discretion. She submitted that since there was no manifest error in the quantum of sentence awarded to the respondents, the present appeal ought to be dismissed. She relied upon the decisions of the Division Bench of this Court in State v. Sonu: Crl.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 3 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Ganeshi Lal Verma And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 23 October, 2019

This criminal revision has been filed with a prayer to set-aside the impugned order dated 25.07.2019, passed by the Special Judge (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 7, Aligarh in S.T. No. 192 of 2017 (State Vs. Sonu @ Sona and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 246 of 2016 It is argued by the learned counsel for the accused revisionists that the applicant no. 1 is father of the main accused Sonu, applicant nos. 2 to 4 are brothers of the main accused Sonu, applicant no. 5 is Bhabhi of the main accused Sonu and applicant no. 6 is mother of the main accused Sonu, who have been falsely implicated in the present case. The trial court has passed the impugned order dated 25.07.2019 erroneously whereby it has rejected the application 11Kha which was moved from the side of revisionists to get them discharged.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1