Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.55 seconds)
Documents citing State vs Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors. on 17 September, 2014

Fir No. 54/13 State vs . Sonu @ Monu Etc. 1 Of 401 on 6 August, 2016

1. Prosecution case: It is the case of the prosecution that on 06.02.2013, a DD no. 8A was received by PS New Usmanpur which was assigned to SI Arvind Kumar who along with Ct. Pushpender reached the spot of incident at main 40 foot road, F-Block Ganga Vihar, but no eye witness met there and it was revealed that injured had been removed to Hospital by PCR van. SI Arvind found one live cartridge and one empty cartridge case at main 40 feet road and blood was also lying there. SHO with staff also reached there who informed the Crime team. SI Arvind Kumar along with Ct. Pushpender reached GTB hospital and collected the MLCs of Brij FIR No. 54/13 State Vs. Sonu @ Monu etc. 2 of 401 Pal, Sanjay and Santar Pal. Injured Santar Pal sustained fire arm injury but was fit for statement. MLC of Suresh was also collected. During interrogation, complainant Santar Pal disclosed that he was at his home, but suddenly accused namely Ashok, Omi, Kamal, Devender, Arun, Anuj, Sonu, Monu and along with other associates came to his house and accused Anuj and Omi @ Omkar had pistols and other persons were armed with lathies and dandas. It is further alleged that Anuj and Omi fired on him and one bullet hit in his right thigh and he also suffered injuries on his chin and finger in right hand. It is further alleged that all the above named accused persons caused injuries to all injured. SI Arvind prepared a rukka on the basis of statement of injured and also seized cartridges recovered from the spot and also prepared site plan at the instance of complainant, but blood earth control could not be collected due to sudden rain. All the accused persons were arrested and charge sheeted under Section 308/307/323/120B/201 IPC and 27 of Arms Act.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No. 28/2014 State vs . Sonu Etc Page No.1 Of 36 on 22 September, 2018

12. Statements   of   accused   persons   u/s   313   Cr.P.C   were recorded   wherein   both   the   accused   have   stated   that   they   are innocent. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Accused Nem Chand has also stated that  on 12.01.2014 at about 7.30 a.m, he left his home for his labour work. When he reached Swaroop Nagar FIR No. 28/2014 State Vs. Sonu etc Page No.9 of 36 Highway and waiting for the bus, one vehicle stopped near him. 3­4 persons enquired him about his name and address. When he was unable to give his ID, then they forcibly took him in that vehicle and brought to police station. There they asked mobile number of any known. Thereafter, he gave them number of one of his neighbours Sunil who also lived nearby his rented residence. Sunil reached at the PS alongwith his driving licence. Police officials sent him back after taking his driving licence by saying that he will be left after enquiry.   Thereafter,   they   forced   him   to   sign   some   blank   papers. When   he   refused   to   do   the   same,   then   they   gave   him   merciless beatings and forcibly took his signatures on blank papers. He kept on saying that he does not know that auto driver. Further, he does not have any concern with the alleged recovery. Even he did   not make any disclosure statement to the police.   At that time, he was not   using   any   mobile   phone.   The   police   officials   have   falsely implicated him in this false case.
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sc No: 440987/16 State vs . Sonu & Ors on 16 December, 2022

When I woke up at about 7 am, Bhanupratap told me that "at about 3 am, I woke up to the sound of the door of the room. I saw that the light of our room was on and Ayub was leaving the room. I called Ayub contractor and he ran out of the room. I also ran after him but Ayub leaving his shawl in our room, one shoe outside our room and one near boundary, jumped over the wall and ran away and at this time also he saw that the street light was also on. He told that I knocked on the door of his room on which Ayub's wife told that Ayub was with you since yesterday evening and after that I went to sleep in my room". Then around 7.00 am I woke up my brother and other people living in the room and saw that my brother Upendra Muski's throat was slit and blood was oozing. On checking, my brother Upendra Muski was found dead. On my raising alarm people gathered and someone called police. You came on the spot and recorded my above statement . I Judgment 5 of 58 SC No: 440987/16 State Vs. Sonu & Ors suspect that Ayub contractor s/o Nandu killed my brother having enmity with my brother Upendra @ Muski....
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Sonu @ Soaib on 24 November, 2022

36. The defence as taken by the accused persons in their respective statement recorded under section 313 of the Code does not inspire confidence and appears to be after thought. The statements recorded under Section 313 of the Code is in conflict with the version in testimony of defence witnesses produced by the accused persons. The SC No. 44/17 State vs. Sonu & Ors FIR No. 814/14 Page No. 19 of 22 defence witnesses have deposed that all the three accused persons were not available at the spot on the day of the incident. But, the brother of complainant Bhanupriya namely Shamsher had caused injury to her with a Tawa. She said defence has been produced by the accused persons for the first time through the testimony of defence witnesses, therefore same is doubtful. Most importantly, the defence as taken by the accused persons was not put to the prosecution witnesses in their cross examination. Moreover, the accused persons have not stated the aforesaid facts as deposed by defence witnesses in their testimony.
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sonu And Anr.//Fir No.134/13//Ps - ... on 16 November, 2019

5. As PW7, the prosecutrix could not recollect the date and month when she was raped by accused Sonu in his house where she had gone to meet his sister Madhu. She also could not recollect the date of marriage of Ruby but it was in June which was held in a village of Meerut and was attended by her also and she had stayed there for about 5/6 days. She deposed that she had filed complaint Ex.PW7/A under section 156(3) Cr.P.C, which was sent to the police for registration and investigation in the case. Both accused persons were summoned in the police station and the matter was compromised as Sonu has promised to marry her. But later, he again refused saying that she should do whatever State vs Sonu and Anr.//FIR No.134/13//PS - Adarsh Nagar//SC No.58228/16. PAGE 3 OF 18 she liked. She next deposed that her medical examination was conducted in BJRM Hospital and statement Ex.PW7/B was also recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. Accused Sonu was arrested from his house on 03.05.2013 at her instance. Next day, his sister Madhu was also arrested at her instance from her house.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 21 February, 2018

Announced in open court (M.R. SETHI) on 21.2.2018 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE - 03, NORTH WEST, ROHINI COURTS, NEW DELHI. State vs. Sonu etc. (FIR no. 497/15 PS Subhash Place)                                                                         17 of 17
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Sonu S/O Sh. Raj Kumar on 20 September, 2022

I was put in a pit filled with sand by those persons, however, I came out from that pit by ramp there. Those persons robbed me for a cash amount of Rs.6,000/- and SC No. 139/2020 State Vs. Sonu etc. Page - 6 of 11 my mobile phone was also found missing in that process. Later on, I came to main road. Dharmender, my son and his friends also came there as Dharmender has to also come to home from dairy farm. They enquired the matter from me and I narrated the incident to them. I was rushed to LBS Hospital by them where I was medically treated. From there, as per medical advice, I should take treatment from another hospital, I went to Trauma Centre of AIIMS from where I was retired myself. Police met me there. I narrated all the facts to the police personnel.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next