Search Results Page

Search Results

21 - 26 of 26 (0.14 seconds)

Mohammad Ismail vs Employees State Insurance Corporation on 6 December, 2022

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party, which has been appropriately denied by the Respondent under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kuldeep Parashar vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation on 25 January, 2023

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party, which is held by the Respondent Public Authority in fiduciary capacity and the same has been appropriately denied by the Respondent under Section 8 (1) (e) & (j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM Page 8 of 11 CIC/EPFOG/A/2021/660465 APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Vinay Prakash Singh vs Indian Institute Of Technology (Iit) ... on 13 February, 2023

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that adequate and point-wise reply qua the instant RTI Application, has been given to the Appellant, as per the provisions of RTI Act, vide letter dated 30.06.2021 and with respect to point no. 1, 2, 4 & 5 of the instant RTI Application, the information sought by the Appellant pertains to personal information of a third party, which has been appropriately denied by the Respondent under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, Page 6 of 9 CIC/IITPT/A/2021/638186 the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hera Shauharat vs Central Board Of Secondary Education on 21 April, 2022

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in point no. (d) to (h) of the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party, which has been appropriately denied by the Respondent under Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shubhra Mathur Urf Shubra Shrivastav vs North Central Railway on 14 September, 2021

However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3