Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Provincial Power Employees Union And ... vs State Of J And K And Ors. on 8 May, 2017

Mohmad Yasin Shah vs Power Development Department on 14 May, 2026

Date: 2026.05.22 15:31:56+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2025.2.1 notified vide SRO-149 of 1973, the ITI qualified technical employees are entitled to a higher technical pay scale. He 54 [4] M O.A 490/2026 submits that the said benefit was extended to a large number of similarly situated employees in various departments including the Power Development Department to the exclusion of the petitioners herein. He submits that the issue regarding grant of benefit of SRO-149 of 1973 to ITI trained employees came to be considered by the Hon'ble High Court in a batch of writ petitions titled Provincial Power Employees Union Vs. State, which were decided by a Division Bench judgment dated 08.05.2017. It is further submitted that the Hon'ble Court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to continue the benefit in favour of employees who had already been granted the same and also to extend the benefit to those employees who had not been granted the same. The said order was challenged by the respondents before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, however the SLPs filed by the respondents were dismissed vide order dated 04.02.2026, thus affirming the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Srinagar Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammad Amin Lone vs Power Development Department on 10 April, 2026

9. Learned counsels for the applicant laid reliance upon a judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of J&K in the case titled as Provincial Power Employees Union v. State, whereby vide [7] O.A. No. 305 of 2026 judgment dated 08.05.2017, the respondents were directed to continue and extend the benefit of pay scale Rs. 5000-8000 to all the eligible employees. It is stated that the applicant filed a number of representation before the respondents, however, he was told to wait for the decision, as the State had filed an SLP against the said judgment dated 08.05.2017. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide its order dated 04.02.2026, passed in Civil Appeal No. 7992/2022, dismissed the appeal filed by the respondents. After the said dismissal, the applicant again filed a representation dated 09.02.2026, however, the same was not decided and, as stated, the benefit is only extended to those whose cases are either pending or disposed of in the Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Srinagar Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagdish Pal Singh vs Power Development Department on 10 April, 2026

10. Learned counsels for the applicants laid reliance upon a judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of J&K in the case titled as Provincial Power Employees Union v. State, whereby vide judgment dated 08.05.2017, the respondents were directed to continue and extend the benefit of pay scale Rs. 5000-8000 to all the eligible employees. It is stated that the applicants filed a number of representations before the respondents, however, they were told to wait for the decision, as the State had filed an SLP against the said judgment dated 08.05.2017. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide its order dated 04.02.2026, passed in [8] O.A. No. 312 of 2026 Civil Appeal No. 7992/2022, dismissed the appeal filed by the respondents. After the said dismissal, the applicants again approached the respondents by way of representation dated 09.02.2026, however, as stated, the benefit is only extended to those whose cases are either pending or disposed of in the Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Srinagar Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tariq Ahmad Lone vs Power Development Department on 11 April, 2026

12.In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, and without commenting on the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to treat the present O.A., along with the representations annexed as Annexures A-15, A-18, and A-21, as representations, and to consider and decide the same in light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Provincial Power Employees Union (supra), wherein the respondents were directed to extend the benefit to all similarly situated employees, which stands affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as the Special Leave Petition filed by the respondents has been dismissed vide order dated 04.02.2026 in accordance with law, by examining the Devendra Tripathi Devendra C=IN, O=Personal, T=5448, OID.2.5.4.65= 1335902360675164369yr67OOaFf4FUU, Phone= 236562a5958b9eca99c76e0cd4bf8b9d299d3cc05b5e9e99bdac2e7edc7b480 6, PostalCode=210205, S=Uttar pradesh, SERIALNUMBER= 4bac910bd6fb0517c9c605b6139bc94885e3842e98c5f4b67497262309ae27c Tripathi b, CN=Devendra Tripathi I am the author of this document 2026.04.12 13:11:44+05'30' ITEM 1 12 OA 315 OF 2026 entitlement of the applicants and whether they are similarly situated, keeping in view the averments made in the O.A. and the documents placed on record.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Srinagar Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pir Irshad Ahmad vs Power Development Department on 21 April, 2026

14.In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the present O.A., along with the Digitally signed by Devendra Tripathi Devendra DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=5448, OID.2.5.4.65= 1335902360675164369yr67OOaFf4FUU, Phone= 236562a5958b9eca99c76e0cd4bf8b9d299d3cc05b5e9e99bdac2e7 edc7b4806, PostalCode=210205, S=Uttar pradesh, SERIALNUMBER= Tripathi 4bac910bd6fb0517c9c605b6139bc94885e3842e98c5f4b67497262 309ae27cb, CN=Devendra Tripathi Reason: I am the author of this document ITEM 4 10 OA 356 OF 2026 representations annexed as Annexure A/8, as representations, and to consider and decide the same in light of the judgments annexed as Annexures A/3, A/4, A/5, and A/6, particularly the judgment in Provincial Power Employees Union (supra), which stands affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 04.02.2026, in accordance with law, by examining the entitlement of the applicants and whether they are similarly situated, keeping in view the averments made in the O.A. and the documents placed on record.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Srinagar Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1