Cr. Case/428834/2016 on 12 December, 2019
11. The accused has denied that he was driving the offending
vehicle on the date of the incident. PW-5 ASI Nand Kishore is the IO of
the case. He has deposed that the RC of offending vehicle was in the
name of 'Poorti Rent A Car and Logistic Private Limited, Lajpat Nagar'.
He visited the said company and served notice U/s 133 MV Act
Ex.PW5/8 to Meenu Narang, Manager of the company. In reply, it was
disclosed that vehicle was given to Jai Shree Ram Tours and Travels,
belonging to accused Satish. Thereafter, notice U/s 133 MV Act
Ex.PW5/9 was given to accused Satish. The notice U/s 133 MV Act
Ex.PW5/10 to the Director of the Poorti Rent A Car Private Limited at
State v. Satish
FIR No. 149/10 P.S.: Najafgarh Page 5 of 8
Mumbai Office and reply was received as Ex.PW5/11. The perusal of
the Ex.PW5/11 reflects that it was informed by the company that
offending vehicle was given to the accused in the month of December,
2008 in consideration of his outstanding amount due towards the
company. The vehicle was given on verbal terms and conditions.