Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (3.60 seconds)
Documents citing Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2018

Siddique Areekkan vs The Senior Geologist on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Eassa E.K vs The Senior Geologist on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Abdul Samad vs The District Geologist on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Eassa E.K vs The Senior Geologist on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Tutu Jose vs The State Of Kerala on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Sainul Abdeen vs State Of Kerala on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Ashok George vs The Secretary To Government on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document

Eassa E.K vs The Senior Geologist on 19 December, 2025

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India66 held that illegal mining takes within its fold the extraction of minor minerals without a mining plan, mining scheme, environmental clearance, mining lease or a statutory requirement, as the case may be, and would attract Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, 1957. It was also held therein that 65 2014 (1) KLT 536 66 2017 (3) KLT 927 (SC) WP(C) No.36843/2015 & conn.cases 2025:KER:97705 -:83:- any person carrying on mining operations without a mineral concession is indulging in illegal or unlawful mining. It has been further held that in case of illegal mining, the defaulter must bear the consequences of illegality and that 100% of the price of the legally or unlawfully mined mineral must be compensated by the defaulter.
Kerala High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - K Edappagath - Full Document
1