Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.32 seconds)

Selvaraj vs Balasubramani on 23 April, 2021

12.In the decision reported in 2013 (1) TNMAC 47 (DB) – (New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Ponnurngam), the claim petitioner has not lost any earning capacity since he has already retired, alleged to have taking tuition. However, the said plea was not substantiated by any positive legal evidence and hence, the Tribunal has rightly negatived the plea of applying of multiplier method on the ground that the injury sustained during the accident has not resulted any functional disability, thereby, affected earning capacity to the claim petitioner. On the point of percentage of disability, based upon the evidence of PW2/Doctor, the Tribunal has fixed the disability at 70% while, the doctor has chosen at 80%.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs K.Anbazhagan on 23 September, 2015

11. Going through the medical records, the Claims Tribunal has found that the respondent/claimant had underwent several surgeries and become orthopaedically handicapped. Applying the decision of this Court in New India Assurance Company Ltd., v. E.Ponnurangam reported in 2013 (1) TNMAC 47, the Claims Tribunal has awarded Rs.1,00,000/- towards pain and suffering.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Manikumar - Full Document
1