Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 323 (1.62 seconds)
Documents citing T.T.Antony vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 12 July, 2001

(Presently In Jail) vs State Of Bihar And on 17 August, 2022

17.It is clear from the words emphasized hereinabove in the above quotation, this Court in the case of T.T. Antony vs. State of Kerala & Ors. has not excluded the registration of a complaint in the nature of a counter case from the purview of the Code. In our opinion, this Court in that case only held any further complaint by the same complainant or others against the same accused, subsequent to the registration of a case, is prohibited under the Code because an investigation in this regard would have already started and further complaint against the same accused will amount an improvement on the facts mentioned in the original complaint, hence will be prohibited under Section 162 of the Code. This prohibition noticed by this Court, in our opinion, does not apply to counter complaint by the ::: Downloaded on - 17/08/2022 20:04:32 :::CIS ...14...
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Saini And Another vs State Of Haryana And Another on 12 July, 2011

In Rameshchandra Nandlal Parikh v. State of Gujarat & another 2006(1) RCR (Criminal)675: 2006(1) Apex Criminal 224: (2006)1 SCC 732, this Court reconsidered the earlier judgment including T.T. Antony (supra) and held that in case the FIRs are not in respect of the same cognizable offence or the same occurrence giving rise to one or more cognizable offence nor are they alleged to have been committed in the course of the same transaction or the same occurrence as the one alleged in the first FIR, there is no prohibition in accepting the second FIR.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - R Bahri - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next