Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing Cement Corporation Of India Limited vs Ashok Singh 2 Mcc/43/2018 Cement ... on 4 May, 2018

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs Sh. Rajesh Stan. & Anr. on 16 December, 2022

5. The reason stated in the revision petition is supported with an affidavit. Therefore, to meet the ends of justice, we allow the present revision petition subject to the costs of Rs.3,000/- and set aside the impugned order dated 23.08.2022 of District Commission below. Costs shall be paid to the complainant before learned District Commission below 2 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., vs Sh. Rajesh Stan & Anr. R.P. No.74/2022 and learned District Commission below is directed to proceed with the matter further as per law after giving an opportunity to petitioner to file reply to consumer complaint.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Satchidananda Rao Mechineni , ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 22 June, 2022

8. Further ld.AR had admitted that details of the property were disclosed by the assessee in pursuant to the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act and the same was duly examined by the Assessing Officer and no additions were made on the basis of the documents filed by the assessee. Moreover it was submitted that notice u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3), the addition can only be made by the Assessing Officer in 7 ITA Nos.395 & 396/Hyd/2021 respect of the documents / incriminating material found during the course of search. For the above said purpose, the ld.AR relied upon the decision of Kolkata Tribunal in the case of M/s. Indian Roadways Corporation Ltd. Vs. PCIT, Central-I, wherein in Para 26 at Page 175 of the paper book it was held as under :
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abdul Islam Siddiqui Died Substituted ... vs Union Of India on 8 February, 2023

It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. Adwait Charan Mohanty, 1995 Supp (1) SCC 470: 1995 SCC (L&S) 522; Union of India v. Sita Ram Dheer, 1994 SCC (L&S) 1445; Nand Kishore Sharma v. State of Bihar, 1995 Supp (3) SCC 722: 1996 SCC (L&S) 124; Stqte of Karnataka v. Mangalore University Non-Teaching Employees' Assn., (2002) 3 SCC 302 : AIR 2002 SC 1223 that if any additional payment, has been made to the employees for no fault of theirs they should not be penalized for this.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shyam Lal vs Union Of India on 15 February, 2023

It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. Adwait Charan Mohanty, 1995 Supp (1) SCC 470: 1995 SCC (L&S) 522; Union of India v. Sita Ram Dheer, 1994 SCC (L&S) 1445; Nand Kishore Sharma v. State of Bihar, 1995 Supp (3) SCC 722: 1996 SCC (L&S) 124; Stqte of Karnataka v. Mangalore University Non-Teaching Employees' Assn., (2002) 3 SCC 302 : AIR 2002 SC 1223 that if any additional payment, has been made to the employees for no fault of theirs they should not be penalized for this.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Khemani Distilleries Pvt.Ltd.,, Nani ... vs Assessee

7. The Ld. CILT. (A) has erred in law in upholding the computation of deduction of depreciation made by the AO. by stating that ratio of the Bombay High Court judgment in the case of Indian Rayon Corporation Limited vs. C.LT. 261 ITR 98 was applicable even to prior year; and in computing depreciation for the years 1996-97 to 2001-2002 despite the fact that the appellant had not claimed the same and no depreciation had been allowed u/s. 32 of the Act, to the appellant in those years on assessment.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next