Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.36 seconds)

Sunil Mukherjee vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 16 June, 1977

In support of his contention that the Court in the interest of justice in such cases has such inherent power or jurisdiction, reference has been made to the decision of the Privy Council in the case of Raja Debi Bakhsh Singh v. Habib Shah, (1913) 40, Ind App 151 (PC). It was further submitted that Mallik J. had not in fact made an order of reference and in support of the submission reliance was sought to be placed on the minutes of this Court.
Calcutta High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 9 - A N Sen - Full Document

Grindlays Bank Ltd. vs Central Government Industrial ... on 6 December, 1977

Lastly, my attention was drawn to certain observations of the Judicial Committee in case of Raja Debi Bakhsh Singh v. Habib Shah, 40 I.A. 151 at page 155 to the effect that any court might have rightly considered itself to possess an inherent power to rectify the mistake which had been inadvertantly made. It was further, observed that the principle of forfeiture of rights in consequence of a default in procedure by a party to a cause, was a principle of punishment in respect of such default. It was, therefore, urged that such penal provision should be so construed as not to defeat the purpose of the Act.
Calcutta High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Mukharji - Full Document
1