Search Results Page

Search Results

61 - 70 of 225 (2.97 seconds)

Google Inc. & Ors vs Competition Commission Of India & Anr on 27 April, 2015

(g) invited attention to Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union Vs. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. (2005) 13 SCC 777, in the context of a Court or a quasi judicial authority having jurisdiction to adjudicate on merits, laying down that its judgment or order can be reviewed on merit only if the Court or the quasi-judicial authority is vested with the power of review LPA No.733/2014 & W.P.(C) No.7084/2014 Page 18 of 67 by express provision or by necessary implication and it is only procedural illegality which goes to the root of the matter and invalidates the proceeding itself and consequently the order passed, which can be reviewed; on the basis thereof it was contended that a perusal of the application of the appellants for recall showed that the appellants were not seeking any procedural review but a review on merits;
Delhi High Court Cites 91 - Cited by 14 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Shattarka Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha, ... vs Asst. Provident Funds Commissioner on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

Asstt. P.F. Commissioner, Nagpur vs Jagruti Bigar Shetaki Pat Purwatha ... on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

The Anjangaon Surji Nagari Sahakari ... vs The Assistant Provident Fund ... on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

The Assistant Provident Fund ... vs The Agrasen Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. ... on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner vs The Vasant Nagri Swhahkari Pat Sanstha ... on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

The Akola Merchant Co-Operative Bank ... vs Assistant Provident Fund ... on 25 April, 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.
Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document
Previous   3 4 5 6 7   8 9 10 11 12 Next