citedby: 527344 year: 2019

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 3 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in earlier judgments in the case of National Engineering India Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2000) 1 SCC 371 and Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.and another, reported in (2005) 13 SCC 777 had reiterated the binding nature of the award under section 18(3)(d) of the Act of 1947 on the basis that for maintenance of industrial peace, such awards are required to be held as binding on all the employees and establishments.

Bombay High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Pitale - Full Document

Search Results Page