Neha Chaturvedi vs State & Anr. on 1 June, 2023
In K. Rajendran & Ors. Vs. Ambikavathy, 2013 SCC Online Mad
116 : (2019) 3 DMC 202, it has been held as follows:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)Documents citing
K.Rajendran vs Ambikavathy on 8 January, 2013
Sandhya Tewary vs Capt. Rajender Tewary on 20 February, 2015
My views are further substantiated by the Judgment dated
09.01.2013 of the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High court in
Crl. R.C (MD) No. 287 of 2012 and M.P. ( MD) No. 1 of 2012 in
matter titled as Arivazhagan Vs. M.Uma & Others and the
judgment dated 08.01.2013 of the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of
Madras High court in Criminal revision Case (MD) No. 482/2012
and M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2012 in case titled as K. Rajendran & Anr Vs.
Ambikavathy & Anr.
Shakeel Ahmed vs Ishrat Nisha on 7 September, 2015
My views are further substantiated by the Judgment dated
09.01.2013 of the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High court in
Crl. R.C (MD) No. 287 of 2012 and M.P. ( MD) No. 1 of 2012 in
matter titled as Arivazhagan Vs. M.Uma & Others and the
judgment dated 08.01.2013 of the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of
Madras High court in Criminal revision Case (MD) No. 482/2012
and M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2012 in case titled as K. Rajendran & Anr Vs.
Ambikavathy & Anr.
Beaze @ Prakash vs P.Mahalakshmi on 16 April, 2015
4. The learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, would raise a
preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of these revisions.
According to him, any order made by a Magistrate under the said Act is
appealable under Section 29 of the Act. When there is a statutory remedy of
appeal available, according to the learned counsel, these revisions are not
at all maintainable before this Court. The learned counsel would place
reliance on a judgment of this Court in K.Rajendran and another vs.
Ambikavathy and another reported in (2013) 2 MLJ (Crl) 406, where this Court
has held that such revision has not at all maintainable in view of the fact
that a remedy of appeal is available.
Pradap Prakash Royapparaj vs Arokia Augustina Mouttapa on 25 March, 2015
Therefore, I am bound to follow the decision, in Rajendran's case (cited supra). Without going into the merits of this case, this Court is of the view that the present case is not maintainable. Interim stay granted is vacated, and I have to dismiss the revision case.
1