Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Jagat Nath Mukherjee And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 27 February, 2003

Mahabir Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand Through The Deputy ... on 13 February, 2026

67. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Patna High Court reported in 2003 (2) JLJR 293 (Jagat Nath Mukherjee and Others Vs. The State of Bihar and others) to submit that under Khas Mahal lease, the renewal of lease is a mere formality which must be granted automatically. He submitted that the learned trial court ought to have directed for renewal of lease and then, the property could have been transferred in favour of the plaintiff.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - A R Choudhary - Full Document

Zaidul Haque vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 5 January, 2015

The   plea   taken   by   the   petitioner   that   the   order   of  resumption is illegal and without jurisdiction is also liable to be  rejected. It is well settled that a lease can be terminated in case of  breach of conditions of the lease agreement. The petitioner has  not produced any material even to indicate that the legal heirs of  original lessee have not violated the terms and conditions of the  lease agreement. The reliance placed by the learned counsel for  the petitioner in "Jagat Nath Mukherjee & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar &   Ors." (supra) is misplaced. In the said case, the resumption order  was passed on the ground that the lessee constructed the shop  and let­out for the commercial purposes. This Court found that in  view of specific clause in the lease­deed for increase in rent if the  premises   are   used   for   commercial   purposes,   the   order   of  7 resumption   could   not   have   been   passed.   The   present   is   a   case  entirely different on facts.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Chandrashekhar - Full Document

Tilottama Bahinipati vs State Of Odisha on 13 November, 2025

"7....................The petitioner has not produced any material even to Indicate that the legal heirs of original lessee have not violated the terms and conditions of the lease agreement. The reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in "Jagat Nath Mukherjee v. State of Bihar (supra) is misplaced. In the said case, the resumption order was passed on the ground that the lessee constructed the shop and let-out for the commercial purposes. This Court found that in view of specific clause in the lease-deed for increase in rent if the premises are used for commercial purposes, the order of resumption could not have been passed. The present is a case entirely different on facts."
Orissa High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - K R Mohapatra - Full Document

Mahabir Tiwary vs State Of Jharkhand Through The Deputy ... on 14 November, 2025

In response, the learned counsel for the appellant has referred to the judgment passed by this Court reported in 2003 (2) JLJR 293 (Jagat Nath Mukherjee and Others Vs. The State of Bihar and others) and submits that it has been held that renewal of Khas Mahal lease is a mere formality and the condition is that the application for renewal has to be submitted within time.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A R Choudhary - Full Document
1