Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.37 seconds)

M.Kumaran vs The Inspector Of Police on 5 March, 2021

In any event, assuming without admitting that there is some confusion in the understanding of the 10/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.R.C.No.115 of 2021 language by which the Explanation has been stated, that issue can however be appropriately addressed by the Government by suitably amending the Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rule, on the lines of the Delhi Police Rules and its Standing Order No.398/2010, which is reproduced in Paragraph 20 of the judgment in Mehar Singh's case (Supra).
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document

M.Kumaran vs The Inspector Of Police on 5 March, 2021

In any event, assuming without admitting that there is some confusion in the understanding of the 10/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.R.C.No.115 of 2021 language by which the Explanation has been stated, that issue can however be appropriately addressed by the Government by suitably amending the Tamil Nadu Special Police Subordinate Service Rule, on the lines of the Delhi Police Rules and its Standing Order No.398/2010, which is reproduced in Paragraph 20 of the judgment in Mehar Singh's case (Supra).
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document

A.Kanimozhi vs The State Rep. By on 25 January, 2016

In the context of service law jurisprudence, if the petitioner seeks employment, it is for the appointing authority to consider the judgment of the trial court in its entirety and to find whether the acquittal is honourable or not for the purpose of employment in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Management of Reserve Bank of India v. Bhopal Singh Panchal, [1994 (1) SCC 541]. This Criminal Revision is allowed. The judgment of acquittal of the Court below on the ground that the prosecution had failed to prove its case is converted into one of acquittal simpliciter. In the event of the petitioner seeking employment, it is for the appointing authority to consider the judgment of the trial Court in its entirety and to decide whether the acquittal C.T. SELVAM J., vsm is honourable or not for the purpose of employment in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Management of Reserve Bank of India Vbhopa Singh Panchal [1994 (1) SCC 541].
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - C T Selvam - Full Document

Union Of India vs Methu Meda on 6 October, 2021

14. The expression ‘honourable acquittal’ has been considered in the case of S. Samuthiram (supra) after considering the judgments of Reserve Bank of India vs. Bhopal Singh Panchal (1994)1 SCC 541, R.P. Kapur (supra), Raghava Rajagopalachari (supra); this Court observed that the standard of proof required for holding a person guilty by a 9 criminal court and enquiry conducted by way of disciplinary proceeding is entirely different. In a criminal case, the onus of establishing guilt of the accused is on the prosecution, until proved beyond reasonable doubt. In case, the prosecution failed to take steps to examine crucial witnesses or the witnesses turned hostile, such acquittal would fall within the purview of giving benefit of doubt and the accused cannot be treated as honourably acquitted by the criminal court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 68 - J K Maheshwari - Full Document

Mahesh Babu vs The State Rep.By on 2 July, 2018

52. ...... In the context of service law jurisprudence, if the petitioner seeks employment, it is for the Appointing Authority to consider the Judgment of the Trial Court in its entirety and to find whether the acquittal is honourable or not for the purpose of employment in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Management of Reserve Bank of India Vs. Bhopal Singh Panchal, 1994 (1) SCC 541.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1