Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (2.86 seconds)

Poonam Gupta vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 February, 2026

6. A Division Bench of this Court, J. Sekar v. Union of India,2 had occasion to deal with identical objections to the composition of single- member-Benches of adjudicating authorities under the PMLA. Rejecting the same, the Court held that under Section 6(5) thereof, the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority may be exercised by single-member Benches. Further, the Court held the requirement of judicial members in administrative tribunals, as laid down in L. Chandra Kumar, would not apply to the adjudicating authority under the PMLA as the nature of the functions of both the authorities were different. The Court noted that the power of administrative tribunals was to the exclusion of the High Courts, whereas, the function of adjudicating authorities under the PMLA was for internal judicial review of the orders passed under Section 5 thereof. The relevant portion of the decision is extracted below, for reference:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Yadvendra Kumar Roy & Anr vs Union Of India& Ors on 24 March, 2021

4. Since the Adjudicating Authority is located in Delhi, the question of maintainability is rejected. Considering the overall facts and circumstances and the fact that the matter is still at show cause notice stage, the Petitioners are permitted to apply to the Adjudicating Authority by moving an application for supply of reasons to believe/inspection and any other material. The Adjudicating Authority will take a decision on the same within two weeks. Upon the decision thereof, sufficient time shall be provided to file reply to the show cause notice. If the Petitioners are aggrieved by the said decision of the Adjudicating Authority, they are permitted to avail of their remedies in accordance with law."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Jatinder Pal Singh vs Union Of India Through Secretary Ors on 10 June, 2022

2.0 At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:12.06.2022 13:16:55 petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Adjudication Authority and this matter is squarely covered by the decision of the coordinate bench in W.P.(Crl) 331/2015 titled as "Rai Foundation Thr. Its Trustee Mr. Suresh Sachdev vs The Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Ors." dated 20.02.2015 and even on merits it is covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.(C) 5320/2017 titled as "J.Sekar v. Union of India."
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Alaknanda Realtors Pvt Ltd And Ors vs Deputy Director, Directorate Of ... on 24 August, 2022

36705/2022(Stay) W.P.(C) 12246/2022 & CM APPL. 36707/2022(Stay) W.P.(C) 12258/2022 & CM APPL. 36730/2022 (Stay) W.P.(C) 12265/2022 & CM APPL. 36756/2022 (Stay) Mr. Hossain, learned counsel appearing for the Directorate states that the challenge which is mounted to the composition of the Adjudicating Authority is one which stands conclusively settled in favour of the respondents in light of the decision rendered by the Division Bench of the Court in J. Sekar vs. Union of India & Ors.[ 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6523].
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

Yadvendra Kumar Roy & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 2021

4. Since the Adjudicating Authority is located in Delhi, the question of maintainability is rejected. Considering the overall facts and circumstances and the fact that the matter is still at show cause notice stage, the Petitioners are permitted to apply to the Adjudicating Authority by moving an application for supply of reasons to believe/inspection and any other material. The Adjudicating Authority will take a decision on the same within two weeks. Upon the decision thereof, sufficient time shall be provided to file reply to the show cause notice. If the Petitioners are aggrieved by the said decision of the Adjudicating Authority, they are permitted to avail of their remedies in accordance with law.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - P M Singh - Full Document
1