Sachin Paswan vs State ( Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 16 November, 2022
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the case.
According to him, he does not have any relation with the instant case. It is
when he was found involved in another case the police has falsely
implicated him in the instant FIR. The applicant is in jail since 27.11.2019
and about three years have passed. As of now, only two witnesses have been
examined whereas 09 witnesses are yet to be examined. He, therefore, states
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:PRATIMA
Signing Date:21.11.2022
18:22:15
-2-
that continuous incarceration of the applicant in the instant case is not
required and the same is furthermore not necessary in view of the fact that
the examination of PW1/complainant has already been done and no purpose
would be served keeping the applicant in jail. Learned counsel for the
applicant further places reliance on the decision of this court in the case of
Hasim @ Sonu v. State of NCT of Delhi dated 26.04.2022 in the Bail Appln.
549/2022, wherein, the co-accused Hasim @ Sonu has been enlarged on
bail. He, therefore, prays parity with the case of Hasim @ Sonu.