Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.54 seconds)
Documents citing Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs Union Of India & Others on 16 December, 1983

M/S Chalet Hotels Limited vs M/S Hindustan Aeronautics Limited on 29 May, 2020

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, in order to dissolve the dispute between the parties, this Court has a wide power to appoint a Commissioner for not only enforcement of fundamental right, but also for enforcement of legal right and the report of the Commissioner has evidentiary value, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India and others reported in (1984)3 SCC 161, para 15, reads as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 85 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt. Chandravva Hanamant Gokavi W/O ... vs State Of Karnataka on 15 April, 2026

112. It is necessary to reconsider the impact that policies such as the setting of informal targets and provision of incentives by the Government can have on the reproductive freedoms of the most vulnerable groups of society whose economic and social conditions leave them with no meaningful choice in the matter and also render them the easiest targets of coercion. The cases of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity [Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of W.B., (1996) 4 SCC 37] and Bandhua Mukti Morcha [Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161 : 1984 SCC (L&S) 389] have emphasised that the State's obligation in respect of fundamental rights must extend to ensuring that the rights of the weaker sections of the community are not exploited by virtue of their position. Thus, the policies of the Government must not mirror the systemic discrimination prevalent in society but must be aimed at remedying this discrimination and ensuring substantive equality. In this regard, it is necessary that the policies and incentive schemes are made gender neutral and the unnecessary focus on female sterilisation is discontinued."
Karnataka High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Mahila Jagran Manch vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 13 September, 1996

In BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA v. UNION OF INDIA , where the State had failed to exercise proper control in regard to inhuman working conditions in stone quarries, inspite of guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in a previous case, the Supreme Court called upon the State Government to act as a welfare State and ensure that workers employed in such quarries are continued to work with improved conditions of service and facilities and release from bondage, whoever who wants to go back to their native places.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Smt. Nisarga Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2024

"16. A healthy body is the very foundation for all human activities. That is why the adage "Sariramadyam Khaludharma Sadhanam". In a welfare State, therefore, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health. This Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India [(1984) 3 SCC 161: 1984 SCC (L&S) 389] aptly observed: (SCC p. 183. para
Karnataka High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Syed Tashrifulla vs State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2024

"16. A healthy body is the very foundation for all human activities. That is why the adage "Sariramadyam Khaludharma Sadhanam". In a welfare State, therefore, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health. This Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India [(1984) 3 SCC 161: 1984 SCC (L&S) 389] aptly observed: (SCC p. 183. para
Karnataka High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Bamboo Hut vs State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2024

"16. A healthy body is the very foundation for all human activities. That is why the adage "Sariramadyam Khaludharma Sadhanam". In a welfare State, therefore, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health. This Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India [(1984) 3 SCC 161: 1984 SCC (L&S) 389] aptly observed: (SCC p. 183. para
Karnataka High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Harsha N vs State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2024

"16. A healthy body is the very foundation for all human activities. That is why the adage "Sariramadyam Khaludharma Sadhanam". In a welfare State, therefore, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health. This Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India [(1984) 3 SCC 161: 1984 SCC (L&S) 389] aptly observed: (SCC p. 183. para
Karnataka High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document
1   2 3 Next