Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Usha Goel vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited on 15 July, 2010

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd vs Sh. Rajesh Sharma on 21 March, 2012

12. Against the judgment dated 09.02.2011 of the Electricity Court, RFA No. 175/11 titled Usha Goel Vs. BSES Yamuna was filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. By order dated 19.04.2011, the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to dismiss the appeal. The Hon'ble High Court concurred with the view taken by the Ld. Special Electricity Court and held that a suit for challenging an inspection report and RCA No. 29/10 Page No. 5/6 a bill on account of theft of electricity can be challenged before the Special Court constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003 by filing of a civil suit.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kripali Devi vs B.S.E.S on 22 February, 2012

12. Against the judgment dated 09.12.2011 of the Electricity Court, RFA No. 175/11 titled Usha Goel Vs. BSES Yamuna was filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. By order dated 19.04.2011, the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to dismiss the appeal. The Hon'ble High Court concurred with the view taken by the Ld. Special Electricity Court and held that a suit for challenging an inspection report and a bill on account of theft of electricity can be challenged before the Special Court constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003 by filing of a civil suit.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Goel vs Champa Devi on 1 May, 2024

3. It is stated in WS that the present application of applicant is liable to dismissed u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC as the applicant has concealed the fact that similar case for grant of electricity connection filed by his wife Smt. Usha Goyal bearing suit no. 1512/2011, titled Smt. Usha Goyal vs. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd was dismissed in default. It is further stated that similar suit was filed by applicant bearing suit no. 23/2015 wherein present respondent arrayed as defendant no. 2 and said suit was also dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2016. That applicant is not making any payment of rent to the respondent since long and electricity meter leading to the tenanted premises had already been disconnected by BSES. That since the disconnection, the applicant and his wife are using the electricity by illegal means and number of theft cases have been booked against them. That Smt. Usha Goyal claims herself to be owner of the premises but no document has been placed on record, whereas Sanjay Goel who is the tenant in the premises had not paid rent since last about 7 years. That respondent never disconnected the electricity supply of the ARC No. 83/2017 Sanjay Goel Vs. Champa Devi Page No. 3/9 premises and same was disconnected by the concerned department i.e. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd due to non payment of electricity charges. Rest of the contentions of the petition have been denied in toto. Hence, The dismissal of the present petition has been prayed for.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1