citedby: 662396

Kirit vs State on 16 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Ravindranath vs Commissioner on 16 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Shivpalsinh vs State on 13 August, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Karsanbhai vs State on 20 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Kokilaben vs Commissioner on 20 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Shakil vs State on 23 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Umesh vs State on 23 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Moinuddin vs State on 23 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Lakhubhai vs State on 23 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Sanjaysinh vs State on 30 June, 2008

5. I am fortified in my view by the decision taken by this court in the case of Sandip Omprakash Gupta v. State of Gujarat (2004 (1) GLR 865) that solitary incident of violation of prohibition law, normally would not be a problem to the maintenance of public order and for such solitary offence, no person can be detained under the Act.

Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Shah - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results