Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 96 (0.74 seconds)
Documents citing Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009

Ramasamy … vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

“9. Conviction under Section 306 IPC is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide. In order to bring a case within the purview of Section 306 IPC, there must be a case of suicide and in the commission of the said offence, the person who is said to have abetted the commission of suicide must have played an active role by an act of instigation or by doing certain act to facilitate the 11/20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/02/2026 03:47:42 pm ) Crl.O.P.(MD)NO.17886 of 2023 commission of suicide. Therefore, the act of abetment by the person charged with the said offence must be proved and established by the prosecution before he could be convicted under Section 306 IPC. (See Amalendu Pal alias Jhantu V. State of West Bengal, reported in (2010) 1 SCC 707).
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Ramasamy … vs The Inspector Of Police

“9. Conviction under Section 306 IPC is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide. In order to bring a case within the purview of Section 306 IPC, there must be a case of suicide and in the commission of the said offence, the person who is said to have abetted the commission of suicide must have played an active role by an act of instigation or by doing certain act to facilitate the 11/20 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 10:53:23 am ) Crl.O.P.(MD)NO.17886 of 2023 commission of suicide. Therefore, the act of abetment by the person charged with the said offence must be proved and established by the prosecution before he could be convicted under Section 306 IPC. (See Amalendu Pal alias Jhantu V. State of West Bengal, reported in (2010) 1 SCC 707).
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Srimathy - Full Document

Samuel vs State By on 30 August, 2016

In this regard, a reference could be made to the judgment of the Supreme Court, relied on by the learned counsel for the appellants/accused persons, to show that in order to bring an accused within the purview of the offence under Section 306 IPC, there must be an aid/act so as to make the deceased to go to such an extreme step of committing suicide; the relevant portion of the said judgment of the Supreme Court, which is reported in 2010 (1) SCC 707 (Amalendu Pal Vs. State of West Bengal), reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next