Usv Limited vs M/S.Aurobindo Pharma Limited on 22 May, 2013
4 (iii). Eco Learn Research & Development A/S v. Intellectual
4/25
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
(T) CMA (TM) No.32 of 2023
Property Appellate Board and another, reported in 2011 (4) CTC 689,
where a Division bench of this Court held that one of the tests to be applied
while considering the question of deceptive similarity is to take note of the
goods to which they are to be applied and nature and kind of customers,
who would likely buy the goods and while examining an application,
Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, the Registrar has to keep in mind that the
statute enjoins upon him a duty to safeguard the rights created under the Act
and to give effect to such rights.