Search Results Page

Search Results

81 - 90 of 130 (2.28 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr on 31 January, 2018

M/S Icici Bank Ltd vs Neeraj Yadav on 17 June, 2020

20. PW­ 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under consideration.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Icici Bank Ltd vs Sanket Sharma on 7 March, 2020

20. PW­ 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under consideration.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

And Having Its Branch Office At vs Sourav Jagwani on 8 September, 2021

20. PW­ 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of CS (Comm.) No. 1585/2019 Page 5 of 10 action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under consideration.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

And Having Its Branch Office At vs Naresh Kumar Kulyal on 15 November, 2021

20. PW- 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on a judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own Hon'ble High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similar to the facts of the present case.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs Mr. Ganesh Datt on 28 October, 2021

15. PW- 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similar as are the facts of the present case.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

And Having Its Branch Office At vs Jatin Talwar on 9 December, 2021

19. PW- 1 has tendered his oral evidence which is contained in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A. A question may arise here that PW1 is not privy to the execution of various documents on which the cause of action has been founded upon by the defendant. On this aspect the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has placed strong reliance on a judgment passed on 31.01.2018 by our own Hon'ble High Court in RFA No. 297/2015 titled 'M/S ICICI Bank Limited versus Kamini Sharma & Another'. The sum and substance of the facts of the said case are similar to the facts of the present case.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hdfc Bank Ltd vs Suhrit Services Pvt Ltd & Anr. on 3 April, 2018

Statement of account certified under the Bankers' Books Evidence Act shows that various instalments towards repayment of the loan have in fact been received by the Bank. Thus, the fundamental fact that the Defendants took the loan and repaid some part of the loan, is admitted. This being the position, the statement of account which is certified under the Bankers' Book Evidence Act, 1891 by the Principal Officer of the Bank, could not have been ignored or held to be not proved in terms of the Section 65B of the Evidence Act. It has been held recently by this Court in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamini Sharma & Anr. [RFA 297/2016 dated on 31st RFA 90/2017 Page 3 of 12 January, 2018] as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - P M Singh - Full Document
Previous   5 6 7 8 9   10 11 12 13 Next