citedby: 78005621

Mmkp Dhan Sanchay Nidhi Ltd vs Vivek Yadav on 16 April, 2025

5. The above discussion would show that without the said certificate under 63 BSA, the document I.e Annexure 5 cannot be read into evidence. The said aspect was also considered by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamini Sharma & Anr. RFA 297/2015:

Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anglian Finvest Pvt Ltd vs Electrev Mobility Pvt Ltd on 23 September, 2025

(ii) M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Kamini Sharma & Anr., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6933;

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. D.P. Sekhri Since Deceased Through ... vs Smt. Soma Sachdeva Since Deceased ... on 13 December, 2025

Page: 20 /33 (xxxiv) In M/s ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Kamini Sharma, RFA No.297/2015, dated 31.01.2018, Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that computer generated statement of account is a printout of electronic document, which is a secondary evidence inadmissible in law unless accompanied by a duly issued certificate under Section 65B Indian Evidence Act.

Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Icici Bank Ltd. vs Dilkash Star Vision & Communication ... on 1 June, 2018

12. Thus, the requirements of Section 65B need to be adapted as per the facts of each case depending upon the witness who is deposing, and are reaxable. Further, the mere non-production of the original recall notice cannot result in dismissal of the suit. This Court has also recently in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamini Sharma & Anr. [RFA 297/2015 decision dated 31st January, 2018] held:

Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S. Icici Bank Ltd. vs Ashok Sharma on 1 June, 2018

11. Thus, the requirements of Section 65B need to be adapted as per the facts of each case depending upon the witness who is deposing. Further, the mere non-production of the original recall notice cannot result in dismissal of the suit. This Court has also recently in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamini Sharma & Anr. [RFA 297/2015 decision dated 31st January, 2018] held:

Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Gaurav & Anr on 1 June, 2018

In Kamini Sharma (supra), this Court has analysed the manner in which Section 65B of the Evidence Act needs to be applied considering the judgements of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer AIR 2015 SC 180 (hereinafter, „Anvar v. Basheer‟) and Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2016 SC 5389.

Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Niharika Chhabra on 23 May, 2018

In Kamini Sharma (supra), this Court has analysed the manner in which Section 65B of the Evidence Act needs to be applied considering the judgements of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer AIR 2015 SC 180 (hereinafter, „Anvar v. Basheer‟) and Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2016 SC 5389.

Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Shyam Sunder Sharma on 23 May, 2018

In Kamini Sharma (supra), this Court has analysed the manner in which Section 65B of the Evidence Act needs to be applied considering the judgements of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer AIR 2015 SC 180 (hereinafter, „Anvar v. Basheer‟) and Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2016 SC 5389.

Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Umesh Rai on 23 May, 2018

In Kamini Sharma (supra), this Court has analysed the manner in which Section 65B of the Evidence Act needs to be applied considering the judgements of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer AIR 2015 SC 180 (hereinafter, „Anvar v. Basheer‟) and Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2016 SC 5389.

Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Vijay Laxmi Joshi on 23 May, 2018

In Kamini Sharma (supra), this Court has analysed the manner in which Section 65B of the Evidence Act needs of Section to be applied considering the judgements of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer AIR 2015 SC 180 (hereinafter, „Anvar v. Basheer‟) and Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2016 SC 5389, as also the scope 2A of the BBE Act.

Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 11 - P M Singh - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results