citedby: 78005621 year: 2025

Virinder Kumar Bajaj Proprietor Of M/S ... vs Mrs Rapinder Kaur And Ors on 3 May, 2025

In M/s ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Kamini Sharma and Anr., RFA No. 297/2015, while dealing with the suit for recovery, Hon'ble Delhi High Court observed that account statements are inadmissible in law unless supported by a duly issued certificate under Section 65B The Indian Evidence Act.

Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Marketings vs Khushal Enterprises on 30 July, 2025

29. Further, in case titled M/S ICICI Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr., RFA 297/2015, it is held that

Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anglian Finvest Pvt Ltd vs Electrev Mobility Pvt Ltd on 23 September, 2025

(ii) M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Kamini Sharma & Anr., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6933;

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kamal Kumar Chawla vs Vinod on 19 September, 2025

22. Further, in case titled M/S ICICI Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr., RFA 297/2015, it is held that

Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. D.P. Sekhri Since Deceased Through ... vs Smt. Soma Sachdeva Since Deceased ... on 13 December, 2025

Page: 20 /33 (xxxiv) In M/s ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Kamini Sharma, RFA No.297/2015, dated 31.01.2018, Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that computer generated statement of account is a printout of electronic document, which is a secondary evidence inadmissible in law unless accompanied by a duly issued certificate under Section 65B Indian Evidence Act.

Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Punjab National Bank vs Raees Salmani (Borrower) on 23 December, 2025

In M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Kamini Sharma and Another , 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6933, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi while dealing with an appeal arising out of dismissal of suit on account of failure of the plaintiff to file original loan recall notice held, as under:

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mmkp Dhan Sanchay Nidhi Ltd vs Vivek Yadav on 16 April, 2025

5. The above discussion would show that without the said certificate under 63 BSA, the document I.e Annexure 5 cannot be read into evidence. The said aspect was also considered by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamini Sharma & Anr. RFA 297/2015:

Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gopal vs M/S Axis Innovations Pvt Ltd on 29 October, 2025

22. Further, in case titled M/S ICICI Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr., RFA 297/2015, it is held that

Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kalki Lghting Ltd vs Shivam Electricals on 27 November, 2025

16. Further, in case titled M/S ICICI Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr., RFA 297/2015, it is held that

Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepika Goyal vs Mansi Pandey on 9 April, 2025

18. So, in light of the aforesaid legal position, the statement of accounts Ex.PW-1/A is per se inadmissible in law. Moreover, while dealing with a suit for recovery filed at the instance of a bank in M/s ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Kamini Sharma and Anr., RFA No. 297/2015, Hon'ble Delhi High Court observed that account statements are inadmissible in law unless supported by a duly issued certificate under Section 65B The Indian Evidence Act.

Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results