Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (2.48 seconds)
Documents citing Air India Statutory Corporation vs United Labour Union & Ors on 6 November, 1996

P Devakanth vs The State Of Ap on 15 February, 2021

The learned single Judge of the Jharkhand High Court placed reliance on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union7 and 6 2005 (2) JCR 269 Jhr 7 (1997) 9 SCC 377 MSM,J WP.Nos.467 & 14658 of 2020 27 Sapan Kumar Pandit v. U.P. State Electricity Board8 and finally concluded that, there was no relationship of employer and employee between the management and employees, thereby, the employees are not entitled for regularization in services.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - M S Murthy - Full Document

A. Srinivasa Rao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its ... on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a five (5) Judge Bench of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 along with its object and intendment by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United 17 Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 & 126 read as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J. Kondala Rao, S/O. Paparao, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. By Its ... on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a five (05) Judge Bench of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 along with its object and intendment, by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs United Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 &126 read as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Chairman / Managing Director, ... vs A.Subba Rao on 20 June, 2025

36. By a plain reading of the above paras of the Constitutional Mandate, the mere issuance of prohibition notification by the appropriate Government under Sub-Section (1) of Section 10 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act,1970, prohibiting the employment of Contract Labour in any establishment, does not entitle the contract labour to automatic absorption. In other words, a mere issuance of prohibition notification by the State Government by itself, will not confer the absolute rights in favour of the Contract Labour / Workman for his absorption into the APGENCO Establishment. However, in the event of APGENCO desires to employ regular Workmen, in that case, it shall give preference to the erstwhile contract Labour / Workman, if otherwise finds fit. In such course, the APGENCO is empowered to relax the conditions in respect of maximum age, academic qualifications, while ensuring that the technical qualifications remain unchanged.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Chairman / Managing Director, vs M. Daniel on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a five (5) Judge Bench of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 along with its object and intendment by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs United 17 Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 & 126 read as under:-
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B.Veerakrishna, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a Five Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act,1970 along with its object and intendment, by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs United Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 &126 read as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M. Daniel vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a five (5) Judge Bench of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 along with its object and intendment by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs United 17 Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 & 126 read as under:-
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Chairman/Managing Director vs B. Veera Krishna on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a Five Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act,1970 along with its object and intendment, by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs United Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 &126 read as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Chairman/Managing Director, vs A. Srinivasa Rao, on 20 June, 2025

In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Others Vs National Union Waterfront Workers and Others (referred to above), a five (5) Judge Bench of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court while dealing with the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 along with its object and intendment by scanning the relevant facets of the Contract Labour aspects, overruled the dictum held in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United 17 Labour Union3 and in unequivocal words arrived its findings. For the sake of comprehensive view, the relevant paras 125 & 126 read as under:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next