Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 64 (1.53 seconds)
Documents citing Air India Statutory Corporation vs United Labour Union & Ors on 6 November, 1996

Jet Airways (India) Ltd., Link ... vs Jet Airways Thozhilalar Sangam ... on 21 June, 2000

(iii) Air India Statutory Corporation, Etc., V. United Labour Union And Others . In that case while considering the notification prohibiting employment of contract labour under Section 10(1) of the Act, issued by the Central Government for sweeping, cleaning, dusting and watching of buildings owned or occupied by establishments in respect of which the appropriate Government under the Act is the Central Government, the Supreme Court held that the appropriate Government is the Central Government from the inception of the Act. Another crucial question which was considered by the Apex Court in that case was whether the High Court was right in directing enforcement of the said notification issued by the Central Government. The Apex Court concluded that though there was no express provision in the Act for absorption of the employees whose Contract Labour System stood abolished by publication of the notification under Section-10(1) of the Act in a proper case, and the court can direct the appropriate authority to act in accordance with law and submit a report to the Court and based thereon relief should be granted. While considering the matter interim order was granted by the Court initially and then it was allowed to continue, whereas in the present case, workers have already been terminated and no notification under Section 10(1) of the Act was issued prohibiting the employment of contract labour.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 16 - K R Pandian - Full Document

Food Corporation Of India Workers' ... vs Food Corporation Of India And Ors. on 17 November, 2000

However, considering this aspect the view taken by the Apex Court in case of Air India Statutory Corporation (supra), no doubt the same has been referred to the Larger Bench for hearing but meanwhile, binding effect of the said judgment to this Court will not make any difference. Said decision, so far, has not been reversed, is binding on this Court and this Court can and is required to consider the same.
Gujarat High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

M.P. Singh & Ors. vs Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Ors. on 29 August, 2011

However, the fact remains that the above judgment in Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union has itself been overruled in the Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Water Front Workers (2001) 7 SCC 1 and therefore, the judgment in Air India would no longer be good law. Learned counsel for the Petitioners then sought to distinguish the judgment in SAIL by referring to the clauses in the shareholders‟ agreement which permitted the Government to again takeover in the event of a threat to the security of the State.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

B. Laltanpuria And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 14 December, 2001

In support of his arguments for regularising the services of the petitioners, he cited the decisions of the Supreme Court in Rabinarayan Mohapatra v. State of Orissa AIR 1991 SC 1287, K.S.P. College Stop Gap Lecturers Association v. State of Karnataka AIR 1992 SC 677, State of Haryana v. Piara Singh, AIR 1992 SC 2130, J&K Public Service Commission, AIR 1994 SC 1808, Air India Statutory Corpn. v. United Labour Union, AIR 1997 SC 645, Secretary, H.S.E.B v. Suresn AIR 1999 SC 1160, G.B.Pant University of Agriculture & Technology v. State of U.P. AIR 2000 SC 2695.
Gauhati High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - A K Patnaik - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next