Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Anuradha Bhasin vs Union Of India on 10 January, 2020

Mr. P. Roy Barman vs Mr. S.S. Dey on 7 October, 2021

The question of the subjective satisfaction of the Magistrate in forming his opinion would also be of considerable importance. While that be so, the Court would be equally conscious about several judicial pronouncements referred to and discussed in case of Auradha Bhasin (supra) putting considerable stress on the requirement of a strict scrutiny on the State exercise of powers of restricting the rights under Article 19(1)(b).
Tripura High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Zeeshan Qamar vs State Of Nct Delhi on 24 February, 2023

Nitisha & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., (2020) 3 SCC 637 Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the application seeking extension of remand essentially focuses on the gravity of the offence much less the specific reasons for seeking such extension of remand. It was further contended that the said application seeking extension of remand is vitiated inter alia on the grounds that it fails the test of proportionality, it is extremely broad and generic in nature and it also fails to meet the specific requirements of the proviso to Section 43D (2) UAPA.
Delhi High Court Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document

Major Singh @ Major vs State Of Punjab on 22 May, 2023

30. In view of the above discussion, this Court finds that the learned trial Court has not followed the drill of the procedure provided under Sections 73, 82, 446 of the Code. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin Vs. Union of India 2020(3) SCC 637 has laid down the ratio that the procedural safeguards provided under the statute are required ot be mandatorily followed and following was observed:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1