Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Vipin Gupta on 22 March, 2018

South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs Mr. Kulbhushan Sakhuja on 20 April, 2022

6. During the pendency of the above Suits, the appellants admittedly paid to the respondent the principal amount on 06.10.2021. As far as the interest thereon is concerned, the learned District Judge in the Impugned Judgments, has placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Vipin Gupta, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 8036, and passed the above-mentioned decree under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - V Sanghi - Full Document

South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs Mr. Kulbhushan Sakhuja on 20 April, 2022

6. During the pendency of the above Suits, the appellants admittedly paid to the respondent the principal amount on 06.10.2021. As far as the interest thereon is concerned, the learned District Judge in the Impugned Judgments, has placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Vipin Gupta, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 8036, and passed the above-mentioned decree under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document

South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs Mr. Kulbhushan Sakhuja on 21 April, 2022

4. The learned District Judge, by the Impugned Order, held that the award of work to the respondent and due execution thereof by the respondent is not disputed by the appellants. The final bill has also been passed by the appellant no. 2 and is not under challenge. The only defence taken by the appellants is that the work in question was under a non-planned head and as such, the payment thereunder will be released only when the funds are available with the appellant. The learned District Judge held that such a defence cannot be accepted. The learned District Judge further relied upon the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Vipin Gupta, (2018) SCC OnLine Del 8036, to Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHALOO BATRA Signing Date:22.04.2022 17:33:49 hold that the respondent would be entitled to interest after the expiry of the period of nine months from the date of the bill.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document

North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs M/S Prince Gupta on 20 January, 2022

On the one hand, the appellant claims that it is not having the funds to satisfy the decree, on the other hand the present appeal has been preferred by requiring itself to pay Court fees of nearly Rs. 40,000/- but also by incurring expenditure towards the legal fee and other expenses when, as a matter of fact, there is absolutely no real issue raised in the appeal. The issue now sought to be raised in the present appeal has already been dealt with by this Court in „North Delhi Municipal Corporation V. Vipin Gupta' RFA 160/2017 decided on 22.03.2018. The Special Leave Petition against the said decision has already been dismissed by the Supreme Court , two other RFAs were also dismissed by this Court i.e RFA COMM No. 18/2021 and RFA No. 360/2021 We would like the appellant to disclose as to who is taking decisions to file such like appeals in the aforesaid background by burdening the exchequer, when the appellant claims that it does not have funds either to pay the contractors in respect of decree passed in their favour or even timely salaries to its employees.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document
1