Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.55 seconds)

Deepshikha vs M/O Human Resource Development on 4 April, 2016

6.2 In Sukhbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors (supra), it has been held by the Tribunal that malice in law can be stated to exist when an action is taken or power is exercised without just and reasonable cause or a purpose alien to the statute. After examining the materials available on record, the Tribunal found that the impugned transfer order was not based on any material, although it was stated by the respondent-Department to be so, and, held that the impugned transfer order having been issued without any reasonable cause is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, the Tribunal quashed the impugned transfer order.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S S Chawla vs M/O Urban Development on 7 June, 2016

3. Counsel for the applicant placed his reliance to the judgment passed by the Allahabad Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Sukhbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors (OA Nos. 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416 and 1417/2012 ) decided on 16.05.2014 and states that Allahabad Bench, while dealing with the matter of transfer, has dealt in paragraph 18 of the judgment about routine transfer:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1