Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Rahul Alias Monu vs State Of U.P. And Another on 16 November, 2022

X (Juvenile) vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 22 November, 2022

5. I went through the impugned order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board. The Juvenile Justice Board referred to the judgement of Allahabad High Court passed in Monu @ Moni @ Rahul @ Rohit vs. State of U.P., 2011 Crl.LJ 4496, wherein it was held that in case the aim and the object of the legislation is not being achieved or the ends of justice may be defeated by releasing the accused, the bail to the juvenile can be declined.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

X(Juvenile) vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 17 November, 2022

07. I went through the impugned order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Banda. The Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Banda referred to the judgement of Allahabad High Court passed in Monu @ Moni @ Rahul @ Rohit vs. State of U.P., 2011 Crl.L.J. 4496, wherein it was held that in case the aim and the object of the legislation is not being achieved or the ends of justice may be defeated by releasing the accused, the bail to the juvenile can be declined.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chand Kishore @ Chandu Thru. His Mother ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 11 April, 2023

The peculiar facts and circumstances of the case are so which prima facie reveals that the manner in which the heinous offence has been committed by the juvenile is evident from the medical report of the prosecutrix, available on record which speaks volumes about the manner in which this inhuman act has been committed. This Court in Monu @ Moni @ Rahul @ Rohit v. State of U.P.; 2011 (74) ACC 353 in paragraph Nos. 14 and 15 of the report held as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1