citedby: 1005828

V. Shanmugham And Anr. vs Carona Sahu Co. Ltd. on 12 March, 1991

The decision in Subbanna v. Seshadiri Rao (1979) 1 M.L.J. 385, is not quite relevant to the facts of the present case except to the extent that the learned Judge (Ramaprasad Rao, C.J.)

Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

S.Selvaraj vs Nagammal on 11 August, 2008

In the decision, Subbanna vs. Seshagiri Rao, reported in 1979 MLJ 385, this Court has held that the subsequent purchaser of a property in the course of proceedings can be brought on record for the purpose of continuing the RCOP proceedings filed by the previous landlord. Application filed by the subsequent purchaser to bring himself on record in those proceedings, would not be a material interdict and as such, there is no statutory bar, preventing the subsequent purchaser from being brought on record for continuing the proceedings either at the original stage or at the execution stage. He cannot claim any right more that he is possessed.

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Tamilvanan - Full Document

P.Balamurugan vs Muthulakshmi on 1 January, 2020

He further relied upon a judgment of this Court reported in 1979 5/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 04:41:44 pm ) C.R.P.(PD)(MD).Nos.2414 & 2415 of 2022 MLJ 385 (Subbanna Vs. Seshagiri Rao and another) wherein it was held that the purchaser of the property in the course of rent control proceedings can be brought on record and he can continue the proceedings.

Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

V. Shanmugham And Another vs M/S. Carona Sahu Co. Ltd., Bombay on 12 March, 1991

For the same contention, he cited another judgment in Subbanna v. Seshagiri Rao reported in (1979) 1 Mad LJ 385.

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Sri Annapurna Sri Gowrishankar vs N.Andal on 2 March, 2011

Similarly, in the judgment reported in SUBBANNA v. SESHAGIRI RAO (1979 (I) MLJ 385), it has been held that the purchaser of a property in the course of proceedings under the Rent Control Act was permitted to prosecute the proceedings.

Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - R S Ramanathan - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

V. Shanmugham And Anr. vs Carona Sahu Co. Ltd. on 12 March, 1991

S.Selvaraj vs Nagammal on 11 August, 2008

P.Balamurugan vs Muthulakshmi on 1 January, 2020

V. Shanmugham And Another vs M/S. Carona Sahu Co. Ltd., Bombay on 12 March, 1991

M/S.Sri Annapurna Sri Gowrishankar vs N.Andal on 2 March, 2011