citedby: 100646572

1 - 10 of 11 (0.40 seconds)

Documents citing Union Of India And Others vs Pardeep Jain And Others on 18 February, 2014

Thakur Dass vs Union Of India & Others on 3 October, 2024

12. The petitioner woke up to the fact that it had been granted relief when the Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered its decision on 18.02.2014 inCWP No. 1466-CAT, titled Union of India & others vs. Pardeep Jain & others.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahender Singh (11/96-97) vs Union Of India (Mukhmail Pur) on 1 April, 2026

21. The share(s) of the petitioner(s) would be determinable as per the judgment u/s 30-31 of the LA Act bearing LAC No. 1666/16, titled as Union of India Vs. Pardeep Kumar & Ors. and statement u/s 19 of the L.A. Act proved on record and the said statement and the said judgment u/s 30-31 of L.A. Act shall constitute a part of this award.

Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushil Kumar vs Union Of India& Others on 3 October, 2024

18. Be that as it may, the petitioner's cause is not different from the cause addressed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the Pardeep Jain case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Joginder Lal vs Union Of India And Others on 5 November, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Nirmala Devi vs Union Of India And Others on 6 December, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Anushil Sharma vs Union Of India And Others on 6 December, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Yashodhra Verma vs Union Of India And Others on 6 December, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Smt. Sunita Sharma vs Union Of India And Others on 6 December, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Narender Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 6 December, 2024

20. The petitioner will be paid all consequential benefits at par with those whose cause was the subject matter of Pardeep Jain's case.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Poonam Sharma W/O Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India Through Its Secretary on 24 May, 2016

In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. The Tribunal has also given similar judgments in other cases of PAs (RTP). Specific reference has been made to judgment dated 31.10.2003 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 788/HR/2001 Pardeep Jain and Others Vs. Union of India & Ors. as upheld by Honble High Court of Punjab & Haryana vide judgment dated 18.2.2014 in CWP No. 1466-CAT-2004 Union of India & Ors. Vs. Pradeep Jain & Ors. Order in the case of Pardeep Jain has already been implemented as per information dated 28.3.2016 (Annexure A-3) supplied under the Right to Information Act. The applicant and others made representation claiming similar benefit. The representation was not responded to by the respondents.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 Next