Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.90 seconds)
Documents citing Harpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 22 January, 2015

Ruldu Singh vs State Of Punjab on 24 March, 2015

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, 2003(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 380 and the judgments of this Court in Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab, 2006(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 719 and Kulwant Singh v. State of Haryana, (2008) 1 R.C.R. (Criminal) 828(2).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P Singh - Full Document

Jatinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 20 March, 2015

In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, 2003(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 380 and RAVINDER SINGH 2015.03.24 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document -3- CRA-S-114-SB-2015 the judgments of this Court in Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab, 2006 (4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 719 and Kulwant Singh v. State of Haryana, (2008) 1 R.C.R. (Criminal) 828(2).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P Singh - Full Document

Jatinder Singh @ Soni vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 2019

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is non- compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The alleged recovery of currency notes of `11,50,000/- has wrongly been planted upon him. Earlier also, the conduct of the Investigating Officer was doubted in judgment dated 19.08.2015 passed by this Court in 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 17-03-2019 11:50:14 ::: CRM-M No. 49837 of 2018 -2- Criminal Appeal No.S-3308-SB of 2014 in case titled Harpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab. Learned counsel also submits that at present, there is no case pending against the petitioner as in one case of NDPS Act, he has undergone the sentence which was only for two months. He is in custody for the last more than two years and four months. Trial may take some time to conclude and no purpose would be served by keeping him in custody.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D Chaudhary - Full Document
1   2 Next