Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Union Of India And Ors vs Ghanshyam Vashisht on 23 July, 2025

21. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that Judgments of M.Subramaniam (supra), Sushil Kumar (supra), and Dal Singh (supra) are distinguishable merely because they fall under Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 10081/2025 Page 9 of 11 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:28.07.2025 19:59:39 Clause X (e) of the Resolution dated 29.08.2008, cannot be a valid ground to not follow or to distinguish the same.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Union Of India And Ors vs Dr Vijai S Karwarsar And Ors on 6 August, 2025

14. A reading of the above would show that by executive directions an attempt has been made to diminish the scope of the Resolution dated 29.08.2008. The Circular, therefore, has amended the policy of the Government of India, which is not permissible. To this effect we concur with the opinion of the Madras High Court in M. Subramaniam (supra) and this Court in Dal Singh (supra) that the expansive scope of policy could not have been diminished by a mere clarificatory circular issued by the Directorate of Expenditure.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document
1