Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Nitin Kumar on 22 May, 2017

State vs . Nitin Kumar on 24 April, 2023

7. PW5 Amit Vohra had deposed in his testimony that he is a businessman He had further deposed that he was also sevadar of Sant Kirandas Charitable, Chander Vihar, Nilothi. He had further deposed that in November 2003, one police official came at aforesaid charitable and he had enquired about the accused Nitin Kumar from Sant Kiran Das, at that time he was ill therefore, he directed him to tell the police official that accused Nitin Kumar was not working in the aforesaid charitable and the identity card (which was shown by the IO to Sant Kiran Das) was not issued by the Charitable society. He had further deposed that he gave in writing State Vs. Nitin Kumar FIR No. : 410/2018 PS Hauz Khas U/s 170/171/420/468 IPC Page no.5 of 15 that accused was not working in the said premises.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Nitin Kumar on 12 September, 2023

16. I may record herein that as per the complainant, the accused herein was apprehended at the spot itself by the public when he was trying to flee away. But this fact is contrary to the record. It is not the case of the prosecution that the accused herein was caught by the public at the spot and in fact, as per the arrest memo, accused was arrested on 02/4/2021 i.e three days after the accident. Thus not only the time of the accident is wrongly stated by the complainant, his claim that the accused was apprehended at the spot is also contrary to the record. If I consider the aforesaid contradiction in State Vs. Nitin Kumar FIR no. 72/2021 Sonia Vihar Page no. 9/10 the testimony of PW-1 coupled with his own conduct in driving his motorcycle without a valid driving license and also considering the first DD entry exhibit A2 wherein the color of the offending car is recorded to be white, there is every possibility that the car driven by the accused herein is not the car which caused the accident or the accused has been falsely implicated in this case.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Nitin Kumar on 9 May, 2025

7. In view of the discussion above, the charge against the accused has not been proved, and he is entitled to be acquitted. Accordingly, accused Nitin S/o Sh. Subhash Chandra stands acquitted of offences punishable under Section 323/341/506 Indian Penal Code, 1860. Announced in the open court SWATI Digitally signed by SWATI GUPTA on 09.05.2025. GUPTA Date: 2025.05.09 16:44:27 +0530 SWATI GUPTA-01 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (SW) Dwarka Courts:New Delhi State Vs. Nitin Kumar
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nitin Kumar vs The State on 11 October, 2021

1. Vide instant appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment of conviction dated 16.09.2014 and order on sentence dated 30.10.2014, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in First Information Report (FIR) No.632/2004, Police Station Kalkaji, under Section 392/34 IPC & 411/34 read with section 482 IPC, titled as 'State vs. Nitin Kumar', whereby CA No. 204296/2016 Nitin Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi Page No. 1 of 10 Digitally signed by ANUJ AGRAWAL ANUJ Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next