Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 330 (0.78 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Prakash Sharma vs Rsrtc And Ors on 12 March, 2012

Rajpal Samota And Ors vs State (Panchayati Raj Dep )Ors on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Sharwan Ram Saran vs Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. & Ors on 3 March, 2014

Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 15/71 respondents thus a direction was given by this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) to consider petitioners therein for appointment but it was only for general/ open category candidates who had secured higher marks than initial cut off marks. Hence, if any candidate failed to secure cut off marks either prescribed initially or later on yet allowed in the trade test and selected leaving the petitioners then action of the respondents is discriminatory and illegal.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 42 - Cited by 52 - V Kothari - Full Document

Amit Kumar vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Dev Anand vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Vijay Singh vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Kaswa And Ors vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Satendra Singh vs R S R T C & Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Sunil Choudhary vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Sanjay Kumawat vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Rajaram vs R S R T C And Anr on 30 July, 2012

Learned counsel for respondents submit that for general category, initially, cut off marks in written examination were 65, later on, it was changed to 75 however pursuant to the directions of this court in the case of Prem Prakash Sharma (supra) those candidates were adjudged suitably for trade test if secured earlier cut off marks but subject to the condition that they had earlier approached this court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next