Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.32 seconds)

Devrekh Exports(Sez), Surat vs Assessee

M/s.D.Jayantilal Exports vs. Jt.CIT in ITA No.1647/Ahd/2008, dated 19/12/2008, decision of which has been elaborately quoted above in this order. The assessee explained his activity as major parts of machineries were manufactured under the supervision of Shri Naik and the manufactured parts were sent to the premises in the SEZ where they were assembled and tested. After being approved, the machinery was disassembled as per the packaging requirements and the product was despatched by shipping containers after being verified by the Custom Department. On the above facts, we find that the purchases shown by the assessee was not disputed by the Department and the same was accepted as genuine. However, in our considered view on the facts of the case, the activity of the assessee which was carried out at the SEZ as claimed by the assessee required consideration which was not considered by the lower authorities. From the details furnished before us also, the activities undertaken by the assessee in the SEZ is not clear. It needs to be examined whether the activity of assembling carried out by the assessee tantamounts to manufacture or producing articles or things or not. Further, the decision of the Tribunal was relied upon by the assessee was also not taken into consideration by the lower authorities.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1