Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Umesh Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Anr on 19 April, 2023

Prem Chand vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 24 March, 2025

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the petitioner and the relief prayed for by him has already been considered & adjudicated upon by this Court in Dr. Umesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.1. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents are directed to examine his case in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document

Kanak Srivastava vs The Vice Chancellor Banaras Hindu ... on 8 July, 2025

23. In the present case, Srivastava was employee of a project called the CBD in the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, IMS, BHU. There is little doubt that this project was funded by private sources and not an employment in the establishment of the BHU. Srivastava's selection for this project too was not in accordance with any rules, as it appears. More than that is the fact that Srivastava joined the establishment of the University as a regular employee, after he applied for the post of a Medical Social Worker with the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, IMS, BHU, pursuant to an advertisement issued by the University, leading to his selection and appointment. There is just no way how services of Srivastava rendered with the CBD Project, that had nothing to do with the University, but funded by a private association, to wit, the Family Planning Association, Bombay, could be taken into reckoning to determine his total length of service for the purpose of computation of his pension. These remarks of ours hold good in the context of Dr. Umesh Kumar's case as well. The reason is that Dr. Umesh Kumar, though appointed as a Medical Officer in the Department of Health, Government of Himachal Pradesh on contract basis, had a contract, that led him to work for 10 years continuously, where his services were regularized in the establishment of the Department of Health. The selection on contract basis, as the report of the decision in Dr. Umesh Kumar would show, came after he had undergone a selection process, in which, 34 other Medical Officers were selected. They had all faced a duly constituted selection committee for the purpose.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jeet Ram vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 1 September, 2023

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the petitioner and relief prayed for by him are covered by the decisions dated 07.08.2023 of the Hon'ble Apex Court, rendered in of SLP (Civil) No. 10399/2020 & SLP(C) No.8012-8013/2021 (State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Sheela Devi), dated 15.06.2015 rt rendered in CWP No.8953/2013 (Joga Singh & Others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others) and dated 19.04.2023 rendered in CWP No.3841/2022 (Dr. Umesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Another). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondent No.2 in light of the aforesaid judgments. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document

Dr. Babita Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Others on 3 October, 2023

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court on 19.4.2023 in CWP No. 3841 of 2022, titled Dr. Umesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others. He further submits that petitioner shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in a time bound manner in light of judgment ibid.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Dr. Umesh Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Others on 24 July, 2023

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue raised in the petition is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3841/2022 (Dr. Umesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.) decided on 19.04.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in light of the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment, in a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document

Date Of Decision: 10.01.2025 vs State Of H.P. And Others on 10 January, 2025

By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 25.07.2023, passed by this Court in CWP(OA) No.5894 of 2019, titled Roop Chand Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, whereby this Court, while disposing of the writ petition, directed respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3841 of 2022, titled Dr. Umesh Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, decided on 01.01.2020 and judgment dated 01.01.2020, passed by this Court in CWP No.3267 of 2019, titled Ram Krishan Sharma Vs. Accountant General (A&E) H.P. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, present petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document
1   2 3 Next