17. Also in case of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009,
Madras High Court. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here
as under :
17. Also in case of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009, Madras
High Court. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here as under :
18. Also in case of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009,
Madras High Court. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here as
under :
17. Also in case of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009,
Madras High Court. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here
as under :
11. At this stage, I would like to refer the judgment passed in case of
M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009, Madras High Court.
The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here as under :
"in the instant case, the appellant/complainant is only
an individual, therefore, it cannot be said that non
production of his account books would affect the case
under section 138 of N.I. Act, though the same is
relevant in a case relating to financial companies and
other institutions having books of account.
12. To further bolster my view, I would like to refer the judgment
passed in case of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009,
Madras High Court. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced
here as under :
9. At this juncture, I would like to refer the judgment passed in case
of M. Vairavan v. T.M Selvaraj Crl A No. 352 of 2009, Madras High Court.
The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced here as under :