Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Dominos Ip Holder Llc & Anr vs Ms Dominick Pizza & Anr on 29 August, 2022

Archian Foods Private Limited vs Anchal Trading Company & Ors on 12 December, 2023

28. Further, in case of food products/ beverages - which are edibles consumed by different age group of people, there should be additional caution, such that these imitative attempts are curbed. This court relies on the judgement of Dominos Ip Holder LLC & Anr. vs Ms Dominick Pizza & Anr. (2023/DHC/7126), wherein it was held that Courts have, therefore, to be vigilant in ensuring that, where the marks relate to consumable items or to enterprises such as hotels, restaurants and eating houses where consumable items are served to customers, such imitative attempts are not allowed to go unchecked. The relevant portion is set out below:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Dfm Food Ltd vs Guiltfree Industries Limited & Ors on 19 December, 2023

28. Further, in case of food products/ beverages - which are edibles consumed by different age groups, there ought to be additional caution, so | that these imitative attempts are curbed. This court relies on the judgement of Dominos Ip Holder LLC & Anr. vs Ms Dominick Pizza & Anr. (2023/DHC/7126), wherein it was held that Courts have, therefore, to be vigilant in ensuring that, where the marks relate to consumable items or to enterprises such as hotels, restaurants and eating houses where consumable items are served to customers, such imitative attempts are not allowed to go unchecked. The relevant portion is set out below:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Dominos Ip Holder Llc & Anr vs M/S. Domnics Pizza & Ors on 28 May, 2025

22. For over last five decades, the plaintiffs have been continuously and uninterruptedly using the trademarks "Domino's", "Domino's Pizza", . In fact, the plaintiffs have also, upon application, been granted registration in India for the trademarks "DOMINO'S", , , , under Class(es) 29, 30, 39, 42 and 43; the details of the said registrations are enumerated in paragraph 27 of the plaint. Moreover, the plaintiffs have asserted their rights over the mark "DOMINICK", as it was previously adopted by them as also citing the cases of Dominos IP Holder LLC & Anr. v. Ms. Dominick Pizza & Anr. (CS(COMM) 587/2022), Dominos IP Holder LLC & Anr. v. M/SDominic Pizza & Ors. (CS(COMM) 357/2024), wherein this Court has recognized the plaintiffs' right over the said mark.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Archian Foods Private Limited vs Dhruvi Beverages Pvt Ltd on 29 August, 2025

31. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that this Court in Dominos IP Holder LLC v. Dominick Pizza 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6135, has held that in cases where the Marks pertain to food products or to establishments engaged in dispensing and serving food, a higher degree of care and circumspection is required. An attempt to exploit the goodwill and reputation of an established brand by adopting a deceptively similar mark may, in appropriate circumstances, justifiably raise concerns of a potential compromise in quality by the imitator. It is, therefore, incumbent upon Courts to remain vigilant in ensuring that, where the marks relate to consumable goods or to establishments such as hotels, restaurants and eating houses serving such goods to the public, such imitative endeavours are not permitted to proceed unchecked.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1