Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1698 (8.65 seconds)
Documents citing Directorate Of Film Festivals & Ors vs Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Ors on 11 April, 2007

Rohini P B vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Benoy K Poulose And Others vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Soumya S vs M/O Labour And Employment on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Aswathy C S vs M/O Labour And Employment on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bindumol M N vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jomy Joby vs M/O Labour And Employment on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bindumol M N vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Boben Joseph vs M/O Labour And Employment on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sivaprasad Unni G vs Sri Asok Kumar Sigh Ias & Others on 10 February, 2026

We find merit in the submission of the official respondents. Respondents cited the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Reserve Bank of India and Ors. v. N.C. Paliwal and others- {(1976 4 SCC 838}, Directorate of Film Festivals and others v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and others-{2007 (4) SCC 737} dated 11.04.2007 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel v. Union of India {2022 (3) KLT SN 55(Case No.43) dated 02.05.2022 wherein it was held that :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 60 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G. Balagopalan vs State Of Kerala on 2 February, 2021

(ii) In Directorate of Film Festivals and Ors. v. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. [(2007) 4 SCC 737], the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the scope of judicial review, while examining a policy of the Government, to check whether it violates the WP(C):5752/2019 62 fundamental rights of the citizens or is opposed to the provisions of the Constitution, or opposed to any statutory provision or manifestly arbitrary and held thus:
Kerala High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 5 - S Manikumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next