Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 91 (1.93 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. vs District Judge, Unnao And Ors. on 6 December, 1983

Great Eastern Appliances Pvt. Limited vs Santosh Kumar Kanodia @ S.K. Kanodia & ... on 8 July, 2011

The decision reported in AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1401(State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. District Judge, Unnao and others) relates to a case where manifest illegality was apparent in the face of records in as much as the courts below had rejected a prayer for condonation of delay on the specious plea that each day's delay has not been explained.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - J Bagchi - Full Document

Priti Devi vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 7 July, 2025

"10. It is apt to mention here that power conferred on the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it (State of Uttar Pradesh vs. District Judge Unnao and others; AIR 1984 SC 1401). The very purpose of such Constitutional powers being conferred on the High Court is that no person should be subjected to injustice by violating the law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Afr M/S. Famous Security Services vs State Of Odisha And Others ..... Opp. ... on 13 October, 2020

... Time and again this Court has reminded that the power conferred on the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it (vide State of U.P. v. District Judge, Unnao [(1984) 2 SCC 673] ). The very purpose of such constitutional powers being conferred on the High Courts is that no man should be subjected to injustice by violating the law. The lookout of the High Court is, therefore, not merely to pick out any error of law through an academic angle but to see whether injustice has resulted on account of any erroneous interpretation of law. If justice became the by-product of an erroneous view of law 27 the High Court is not expected to erase such justice in the name of correcting the error of law."
Orissa High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - M Rafiq - Full Document

M/S. Vfpl Asipl Jv Company vs Union Of India And Others ..... Opp. ... on 15 October, 2020

... Time and again this Court has reminded that the power conferred on the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it (vide State of U.P. v. District Judge, Unnao [(1984) 2 SCC 673] ). The very purpose of such constitutional powers being conferred on the High Courts is that no man should be subjected to injustice by violating the law. The lookout of the High Court is, therefore, not merely to pick out any error of law through an academic angle but to see whether injustice has resulted on account of any erroneous interpretation of law. If justice became the by-product of an erroneous view of law the High Court is not expected to erase such justice in the name of correcting the error of law."
Orissa High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 1 - M Rafiq - Full Document

P.Prasad, vs Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, on 10 July, 2019

("Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal 4" and "State of U.P. v. District Judge, Unnao5"). The High Court exercises its discretion, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with great caution and only in furtherance of public interest, and not merely on the making out of a legal point. This Court is required to keep larger public interest in mind in order to decide whether its intervention is called for or not. Only when it comes to the conclusion that overwhelming public interest requires interference, would it intervene in the matter.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijayakumar vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors on 1 February, 2022

"12. We are greatly disturbed by the insensitivity reflected in the impugned judgment rendered by the learned single Judge in a case where judicial mind would be tempted to utilize all possible legal measures to impart justice to a man mutilated so outrageously by his cruel destiny. The High Court non-suited him in exercise of a supervisory and extraordinary jurisdiction envisaged under Article 227 of the Constitution. Time and again this Court has reminded that the power conferred on the High Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it. {vide State of Uttar 58 Pradesh vs. District Judge, Unnao and ors. (AIR 1984 SC 1401)}. The very purpose of such constitutional powers being conferred on the High Courts is that no man should be subjected to injustice by violating the law. The look out of the High Court is, therefore, not merely to pick out any error of law through an academic angle but to see whether injustice has resulted on account of any erroneous interpretation of law. If justice became the byproduct of an erroneous view of law the High Court is not expected to erase such justice in the name of correcting the error of law."
Karnataka High Court Cites 93 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Fatma Kubra vs Addl. Commissioner Administration ... on 21 April, 2022

"We are greatly disturbed by the insensitivity reflected in the impugned judgment rendered by the learned single Judge in a case where judicial mind would be tempted to utilize all possible legal measures to impart justice to a man mutilated so outrageously by his cruel destiny. The High Court non-suited him in exercise of a supervisory and extraordinary jurisdiction envisaged under Article 227 of the Constitution. Time and again this Court has reminded that the power conferred on the High Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it [vide State of U.P. v. District Judge, Unnao, (AIR 1984 SC 1401)]. The very purpose of such constitutional powers being conferred on the High Courts is that no man should be subjected to injustice by violating the law. The look out of the High Court is, therefore, not merely to pick out any error of law through an academic angle but to see whether injustice has resulted on account of any erroneous interpretation of law. If justice became the byproduct of an erroneous view of law the High Court is not expected to erase such justice in the name of correcting the error of law." (Emphasis supplied by the Court)"
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

M/S Shri Santosh Saw Mill And Anr vs Allahabad Bank And Ors on 12 October, 2022

... Time and again this Court has reminded that the power conferred on the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is to advance justice and not to thwart it (vide State of U.P. v. District Judge, Unnao13). The very purpose of such constitutional powers being conferred on the High Courts is that no man should be subjected to injustice by violating the law. The lookout of the High Court is, therefore, not merely to pick out any error of law through an academic angle but to see whether injustice has resulted on account of any erroneous interpretation of law. If justice became the by-product of an erroneous 12 AIR 1952 All. 788 13 (1984) 2 SCC 673 SURESH KUMAR 2022.10.12 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.21059 of 2018 (O&M) and CWP No.26146 of 2018 (O&M) Page 31 of 31 view of law the High Court is not expected to erase such justice in the name of correcting the error of law."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next