Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (4.54 seconds)
Documents citing Adarsh Kumar, New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 15 November, 2017

Tricentis Gmbh,Austria vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 6 November, 2024

5. Having considered rival submissions, we find, the issue is squarely covered against the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT (supra). No other contrary decision was brought to our notice by either of the parties. Since, above mentioned decision is the only decision of High Court available before us, respectfully following the ratio laid down therein, we hold that the impugned assessment orders are valid. Accordingly, ground no. 2 in both the appeals are dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tricentis Gmbh,Austria vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... on 6 November, 2024

5. Having considered rival submissions, we find, the issue is squarely covered against the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT (supra). No other contrary decision was brought to our notice by either of the parties. Since, above mentioned decision is the only decision of High Court available before us, respectfully following the ratio laid down therein, we hold that the impugned assessment orders are valid. Accordingly, ground no. 2 in both the appeals are dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito Ward 2, Ahmednagar, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito Ward 2, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito Ward2, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito, Ward 2, Ahmednagar, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 28 June, 2024

5.10 The Ld.AR placed reliance on recent most decision of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of Adarsh Developers vs. DCIT, reported in (2024) 158 taxman.com 81. She submitted that, Hon'ble Court in this decision has held that, the jurisdiction in any case cannot be challenged beyond the period of one month from the receipt of a notice issued by a non-jurisdictional officer. In this connection, she submitted that, in the present facts of the case at every stage, the assessee had challenged various notices issued by the non-jurisdictional officers, in lieu of which, necessary steps were adopted by the authorities, thereby transferring the case to the ACIT(E), Circle - 1.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito, Ward 2, Ahmednagar, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somnath Ramdas Jadhav,Ahmednagar vs Ito Ward 2, Ahmednagar on 12 November, 2025

6.3 Recently, Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Adarsh Developers Vs. DCIT [2024] 158 Taxmann.com 81 also upheld the same that the appellant cannot challenge the issue of jurisdiction after expiry of one month from the date on which the notice was served. In the present case, several notices were issued and the appellant did not respond all those statutory notices.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next