Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (1.31 seconds)
Documents citing Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 1 June, 2012

Parmanand vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 2 November, 2012

22. What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the identical questions came to be decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Paramjeet Singh, J.) in main Crl.Misc. No.M-9327 of 2012 titled as "Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab" along with 20 other connected cases, decided on 1.6.2012. After considering the relevant provisions, rules framed under the NDPS Act, the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and various judgments, it was ruled as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 24 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Jagtar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 12 September, 2012

8. What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the identical questions came to be decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Paramjeet Singh, J.) in main Crl.Misc. No.M-9327 of 2012 titled as "Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab" alongwith 20 other connected cases, decided on 1.6.2012. After considering the relevant provisions, rules framed under the NDPS Act, the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and CRM No. M-28114 of 2012 (O&M) -4- various judgments, it was ruled as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Ajay Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 15 October, 2012

8. What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the identical questions came to be decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Paramjeet Singh, J.) in main Crl.Misc. No.M-9327 of 2012 titled as "Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab" alongwith 20 other connected cases, decided on 1.6.2012. After considering the relevant provisions, rules framed under the NDPS Act, the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and various judgments, it was ruled as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Amandeep Singh Alias Happy vs State Of Punjab on 19 November, 2012

9. It is not a matter of dispute that as the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances recovered from the possession of petitioner fall within the ambit of Table/Schedule appended to NDPS Act, therefore, the contentions of learned counsel for petitioner "stricto sensu" deserve to be and are hereby repelled under the present set of circumstances as the law laid down in the aforesaid judgments "mutatis mutandis" is applicable to CRM No. M-35997 of 2012 (O&M) 4 the facts of the present case and is the complete answer to the problem in hand. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of regular bail.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Shashi Mahla vs State Of Punjab on 9 May, 2013

Having interpreted the relevant provisions & rules of the NDPS Act, the Cosmetics & Drugs Act and the previous judgment of this Court in case Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, 2013(1) RCR (Criminal) 428, it was ruled that the total mass of the contraband seized shall be considered for the purpose of determining the commercial commodity and the possession of such manufactured Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, contravene the provisions of, and is punishable under the NDPS Act, Rules and Order, 1993. Therefore, the indicated ratio of law is "mutatis mutandis" is applicable to the facts of the present case and is complete answer to the problem in hand.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Kamaljeet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 8 May, 2013

Having interpreted the relevant provisions & rules of the Crl. Misc. No. M-14627 of 2013 (O&M) -5- NDPS Act, the Cosmetics & Drugs Act and the previous judgment of this Court in case Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, 2013(1) RCR (Criminal) 428, it was ruled that the possession of such manufactured Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, contravene the provisions of, and is punishable under the NDPS Act, Rules and Order, 1993. Therefore, the indicated ratio of law is "mutatis mutandis" is applicable to the facts of the present case and is complete answer to the problem in hand.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Sullar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next