Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)

Sri Ramesh S/O Shankar Rao Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2026

Mery Kutty Vs. The Hindusthan Times, Bangalore and Another3 (Mery Kutty), iv. Sharanabasappa Andanappa Chiniwar Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police4 (Sharanabasappa), v. Zahur Mulla Vs. Union on India and Others5 (Zahur Mulla), to contend that where termination is founded on adverse material or casts a stigma, it is punitive and unsustainable without due process.
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mallikarjun (Mallappa) S/O Ningappa ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2020

In this writ petition the petitioner has claimed that he was appointed as a Computer Operator by respondent No.4, initially for a term of six months and thereafter, he was continued from the year 2008 till the year 2016. He claimed that respondent No.2 without conducting any enquiry of whatsoever nature issued an official memorandum dated 04/05.01.2016 (Annexure-A), 3 terminating the services of the petitioner accusing him of misappropriation and directly responsible for violation of the guidelines relating to MGNREGA scheme. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the ground on which he was terminated is stigmatic and that there cannot be termination on stigmatic ground without there being a corresponding domestic enquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioner would seek support from an order dated 07.02.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.No.202543/2016 and also a judgment in the case of Mary Kutty vs. The Hindusthan Times and Another reported in ILR 2006 KAR 1772 .
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N Rangaswamy - Full Document
1